• kadu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      There is a federated version of YouTube…

      But storing video is a massive challenge, way harder than dealing with a Lemmy or Mastodon instance.

      • @dan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My rational mind realises it’s such an expensive system to run that it’s reasonable for them to charge or show ads. The problem is they’ve been extremely aggressive with ads and pushing subscriptions, to the point where I’m pretty resentful of the idea. Plus they’ve neglected so many things (like allowing aggressive copyright predators and refusing to implement sensible human-based appeals processes) that they really should have dealt with and instead embraced an algorithm that I’m pretty sure is at least partially responsible for the radicalisation of large groups of people.

        I… don’t mind paying for shit. I just don’t want to give them money.

        Also: wow there’s federated video sharing? Bet that’s not cheap to run.

      • JoYo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        even google is having difficulty storing video.

  • @donio@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    When you have a goose that produces a reliable daily supply of golden eggs do you:

    1. keep collecting your daily egg
      or
    2. see if giving it a good kick or two gets you more eggs
    • @Zifnab25@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      As YouTube increases the number and length of ads, the amount of traffic behind blockers rises accordingly.

      This is also just… a function of the evolving digital space. The consolidation of the internet ownership sphere and the modernized APIs/coding tools afford server-side content warehouses more and more power over what the end user receives.

      Because AWS owns all the fucking rack space, because ISP monopolies are the defining feature of western net access, and Microsoft force-feeds people their proprietary interfaces, we’re moving away from the point where clients control what they display and closer to the point where everything’s just a dumb-terminal for big business.

      We’re effectively backpeddling from Web 2.0 to Terrestrial TV.

    • @Link@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Youtube most likely never made any money. Hosting these vast amounts of video is expensive. Google stopped telling us how much they money youtube made them lose. You would think they would start bragging when they could make a profit off of it.

      That being said, this still sucks of course.

      • @naoseiquemsou@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Although they don’t profit directly from youtube, it’s a strategy they take to impede competition from arising and keeping their name as the main one. It’s the kind of strategy only multibillionaire companies can do, and, in my opinion, something that should be restricted, because it affects smaller businesses to the point of becoming inviable.

        • @Zifnab25@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          More notably, its a strategy they can do when borrowing costs are functionally zero.

          A lot of this shit is just the consequence of Fed Rate Policy. No more cheap money means these loss leaders are actually being expected to generate profit, not to just act as clearing houses for propaganda.

        • @Link@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I agree. Amazon is infamous for that strategy as well. They either buy competitors or make a loss until the competitor is bankrupt.

  • @manned_meatball@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    oh boy, I wish youtube kills itself like reddit is doing right now so decentralized alternatives can become widely adopted

    • @pinwurm@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      YouTube is a bit of a different animal.

      YouTube allows creators to monetize content - so there’s a sense of shared success. Channels from Tom Scott or Captain Disillusion are amazing, because their production in part relies on that revenue model.

      YouTube also understands that without paying for popular content, you won’t get the consistent cavalcade of medium content from people that want to earn a living or notoriety through YouTube. And that include anything from videos of cats falling over, blogs about life in remote places, DIY home improvement or niche guitar technique lessons.

      Meanwhile on Reddit, if a user gets thousands of upvotes and a million page views for a short story they wrote exclusively for the platform, Reddit won’t pay them a cent. The very thought is laughable.

      The other thing to consider is that the technology just doesn’t exist for there to be a viable ‘federated’ YouTube. YouTube has 800 million videos - many in HD and many are hours long. That’s a big ask in terms of storage and maintenance - even several thousand videos.

      Video compression has a long way to go before that changes. For now, it makes sense for leave that storage to the companies with resources.

      Text, however… well, all of Wikipedia can fit on around 20 gigs - 60 million odd articles. And for the record, that can pretty much fit on an iPod from 2002.

      I do wish that YouTube wasn’t a monopoly. Twitch is the only thing that’s close, and it has it’s own special lane for live streaming. Back in the old days, there was some competition - including Google Video. But that went away when Google bought YouTube. I guess there’s Vimeo, but they’ve got a very different approach.

      I mean, the Justice Department is suing Google for monopolizing ad tech - and I think we could see antitrust laws used in the next few years to breakup YouTube. Maybe the successor companies would federate - like when Bell was broken up into what became Verizon and ATT - who now directly compete for customers.

  • Albert
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    Just FYI for anyone reading: Invidious and Piped are great YouTube mirrors, and Piped even blocks in-video sponsor sections!

  • @waspentalive@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    As fill-in ads are a vector for computer viruses and other malware I for one will NOT be disabling my ad blocker unless YouTube is willing to provide a lifetime subscription to something like Life Lock and make me whole for anything lost to whatever malware arrives as a part of an ad.

    Where else can I watch sci-show, Linus-tech-tips, and all the other channels I subscribe to?

    • @beatniak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Just use newpipe. It’s youtube without the ads. Doesn’t have casting support, but it allows you to download the videos. You can also listen/download to the audio of videos, without fetching the video.

      • @blank_sl8@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Newpipe will probably be blocked as well if youtube is doing this. Honestly not sure why youtube hasn’t blocked yt-dlp and others already.

        • @SuspiciousUser@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I do wonder how much of an impact command line youtube downloaders have on them. I can’t imagine much since the typical user couldn’t operate it. A few years ago the RIAA tried to take yt-dl down, and did for a while, but it was deemed meritless so it’s back up.

        • @KindnessInfinity@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          It’s not easily block able as it scrapes the YouTube website. They’d have to stop having a website for that to happen.

          • @dan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The problem with scraping is that while it’s difficult/impossible to block completely, it’s pretty easy to keep making changes to your site to disrupt scrapers. The work required by the scraper to adapt to those changes is usually way more than the work you put in to disrupt them.

            So if a commercial site wants to make scraping unreliable and impractical, they almost certainly can.

          • @dogmuffins@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            this particular cat and mouse has been going on for a long time.

            Although I get the impression it’s not particularly aggressive.

            There was a while there about a year ago where newpipe seemed to break every week and you had to install the next patch version from github. It’s not like newpipe had to develop some new workaround or something, just changed class names or something.

    • @hugz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      The great thing about using free open-source software is the immunity from corporate shenanigans.

      • datendefekt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Well, all the open-source Reddit clients are pretty drastically affected by Reddit’s shenanigans.

        • @hugz@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          RedReader isn’t actually. Reddit granted them an exemption, partially because it’s FOSS

  • Landor Dragen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    YouTube is the only Google service I use on a regular basis. Happy to leave them behind if they continue with this type of behavior.

    It would be less convenient, but it is what it is and if there’s one thing I can’t stand, it’s ads.

  • nighty
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    They have really gone all out on the whole enshittification process during the past couple of years, haven’t they?

    • @NotBadAndYou@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Just wait until they figure out how much more $$$$ they can make by putting all content behind microtransactions:

      Imagine a world where, instead of grappling with complex tokens and crypto jargon, you have a digital wallet connected to your Web browser. This wallet would automatically handle microtransactions as you browse and consume content, creating a seamless and simplified experience, reminiscent of exchanging tokens at a funfair or arcade

      This transition to the Great Paywall isn’t just about the monetization of content; it’s about balancing the scales and recognizing the value of content creators in the digital ecosystem. In the next chapter of the Web, users aren’t just passive consumers but active participants whose attention carries tangible value.

      • nighty
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Let’s not forget that, if we do go down the microtransaction hell of an internet path, we’d be screwing things up big-time for the coming generations…

  • ram
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    You can watch any YouTube video on Invidious, Peertube is a federated alternative to Youtube, Odysee is a blockchain based Youtube alternative that kicks back to creators and users, and many creators use Nebula as a subscription platform that directly pays them.

  • @androidul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    They already get a lot of 💰from ad revenue, charging for a subscription just made that revenue even bigger.

    It’s possible they’re losing some coins here and there from the ad revenue that they’ve become so aggressive 😆

  • @jmp242
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    I feel like extensions are pretty savvy for fixing this. If not, I will waste less time on YouTube. Hell, why not another big site getting over my limit for hoops that are worth jumping through vs value I get.

    • @sacredbirdman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Yup, a lot of my time got wasted on YouTube… I watched “educational” and “interesting” videos but I have to say that many of the creators got caught into enshittification process too… I would do well with 95% reduction in watch time. However, if they start a real war against adblockers… 100% reduction will it be.

      • @nik282000@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        The 10min minimum is why I pretty much stopped posting. If you don’t provide enough viewing time for 2 pre-rolls and one intermission your revenue per 1k views drops off and you don’t get promoted to new viewers.

  • @Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    We did the Twitter to Mastodon migration. Now we are doing the Reddit to Lemmy/kbin migration. When are we doing the YouTube to Peertube migration?