I filed an issue on the lemmy and kbin issue trackers to address duplicate communities. If you have an #ActivityPub development experience/knowledge, please take a look and offer feedback. If not, please offer any feedback here.
I filed an issue on the lemmy and kbin issue trackers to address duplicate communities. If you have an #ActivityPub development experience/knowledge, please take a look and offer feedback. If not, please offer any feedback here.
Really like the thinking.
I suspect however that your proposal would dissolve the boundaries between communities too much. And potentially create a problematic amount of work and traffic and confusion across the federation.
I would counter-propose to put the aggregation on the user/client side, where, like on reddit, users can create custom feeds that aggregate multiple communities. This is also, generally, a feature in the fediverse-microblogging platforms.
At the moment, lemmy provides “All”, “Local” and “Subscribed”. So my proposal would be that there’d be a fourth “User” feed, with any number of sub-feeds or filters. Perhaps, speaking of UI, it could just be available as a special filter under “Subscribed”.
Either way, the User would create a feed by listing the communities that would contribute to that feed. Give the feed a name and then view it whenever they like. Given that similar logic is already happening for the “Subscribed” feed, I would imagine that this is a realistic feature
Some additional enhancements could be the following:
As for the general idea behind your proposal … that is, allowing communities to align with each other in some way … I think that is still interesting.
In line with my proposal above, maybe what could happen is that community admins can have an easy process for “aligning” with each other, much like your “follow” mechanism. And the result of this is that there’s some button when you’re viewing a community that will provide a list of “aligned” communities which you can then easily add to a new or existing custom “User” feed.