As asked

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Pretty much.

    The co2 we are emitting into the atmosphere is leading to problems.

    Rational response: reduce our co2 emissions as fast as possible.

    Our constant population expansion and habitat destruction is causing a new mass extension event:

    Rational response: Limit population growth. reduce environmental impact and regenerate damage already done.

    Etc

    etc

    etc.

    • kakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      While I agree there are some problems that would be best solved through rational thinking, I wouldn’t want to live in a purely “rational” world. The entirety of the human experience lies between the gaps of rationality.

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Wanting to feel love and happiness is quite rational too. Irrational feelings are not “anti- rational” they are just orthogonal, like color to taste. But making decisions based pure on feelings IS anti-rational.

      • osarusan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s a popular trope that is spouted by anti-rationalists all the time, but it’s a total red herring. It’s one of those rhetorical tactics that is designed to disrupt judgment and put a stop to a conversation before the absurdity of the claim is made obvious. It’s drilled into us as children through tv, movies, even books, but it’s entirely false.

        Rationalism has plenty of room for fantasy, emotion, and everything else that humans experience. It’s not a choice between being rational and being a fully developed human. The choice is between being rational and being irrational. Everything else is its own separate thing.