• tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m going to upvote you, because I like your anger. But that would probably be a terrible idea to allow convicted killers and rapists out on the street who have not been rehabilitated.

      I wouldn’t argue with the possibility of temporarily releasing nonviolent criminals. 

      • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every prison should be replaced with facilities for drug treatment, support groups, and job training. Give those people something to do and they won’t be a threat to anyone, and that burden on society will disappear in a couple generations because they’re not passing it on to their offspring.

        But of course that doesn’t directly make money for the people who own the system, so good luck convincing the folks in charge to make a change.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol obviously there are horrific things happening but you do realize that is completely impossible yes?

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why?

        They can’t stop us all. The only thing standing in the way of good is people who consider themselves good but stand by doing nothing while witnessing evil.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wut

          Releasing all prisoners at once is simply the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Dumbest thing [you] ever heard” is entirely different from “completely impossible,” you know.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Obviously it’s “possible” to unlock all the doors and walk away.

              Whatcha gonna do with all the actual, legitimate violent criminals who just got dumped back into society all at once?

              • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Actually no its not possible to do that because if you do that some of the prisoners will become the new jailers.

                What I’m saying is that it is not actually possible for everyone to be free, because there are some people who aren’t the government who will actively kidnap and imprison other people.

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Obviously it’s “possible” to unlock all the doors and walk away.

                Thank you for admitting you were wrong.

                Whatcha gonna do with all the actual, legitimate violent criminals who just got dumped back into society all at once?

                How the fuck should I know? It wasn’t my idea, nor did I endorse it.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Alright Copernicus, clearly the suggestion that it was “impossible” related to the unacceptable nature of releasing all criminals without review.

                  Agree that if you enforce childish semantic literalism then yes, I was wrong. But if you have at least two functioning neurons you’d understand quite clearly what was going on.

                  Assuming you do, that means you intended to be petty, and have nothing to add.

                  • grue@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Assuming you do, that means you intended to be petty, and have nothing to add.

                    You get what you give, buddy.