The media won’t give me great answers to this question and I think this I trust this community more, thus I want to know from you. Also, I have heard reports that Russia was winning the war, if that’s true, did the west miscalculate the situation by allowing diplomacy to take a backseat and allowing Ukraine to a large plethora of military resources?

PS: I realize there are many casualties on both sides and I am not trying to downplay the suffering, but I am curious as to how it is going for Ukraine. Right now I am hearing ever louder calls of Russia winning, those have existed forever, but they seem to have grown louder now, so I was wondering what you thought about it. Also, I am somewhat concerned of allowing a dictatorship to just erase at it’s convenience a free and democratic country.

  • half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Right now I am hearing ever louder calls of Russia winning

    Winning was taking over the county at first. Then it was kherson, and donbass, crimea, and a few others. Now it’s just like 3 areas. If you’re hearing anything about winning it’s because the goal posts are moving.

    Youtuber Perun had some good high level takes on the war. It all boils down to Western support will win. As long as support keeps coming from the rest of the world, eventually Russia will run out of material. WW2 was won (not wholly, but in large part) due to the larger economy being on the allies side.

    • fosforus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they get to keep Crimea, that’s a win for them. Perhaps not as huge a win they originally wanted, but Crimea isn’t considered theirs by anybody but them and their closest sycophants.

    • boreengreen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      During ww2 the involved parties and their allies were in wartime economy. This is the support that ukraine needs. I feel like today, the west is sending the military version of happy meal aid packages, once in a while, when it’s politically convenient. Should we scale up manufacturing for wartime? Let’s procrastinate.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, the amount of aid and material they’re sending is substantial, including modern tanks and artillery, as well as more mundane things like shells, bullets etc.

        And they will keep doing it for as long as it takes.

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The amount of people fighting back on supporting a sovereign democracy getting attacked by a oligarchical dictatorship is nuts.

        Like we did appeasement in the 40s already, it was a bad strategy.

      • dudinax@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        The West would like Ukraine to win, but it’s more important to the West that the war drag on and be a drain on Russia’s resources.

        • Kissaki@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          No it’s not. The west has nothing to gain from it dragging on. Nobody wants it to drag on.

          • ours@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It sucks for Ukraine but a Russia tied down in Ukraine has less funds to meddle with the rest of the World.

            It drains their military and their economy while Putin must be extra careful against coups. There has been one very famous coup attempt directly related to the war (Wagner Group) and who knows how many other smaller attempts have been stopped preemptively?

            • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Very expensive way to drain Russia. Tbh following trends the best way to drain Russia was the status quo of letting Putin dictate it into obscurity through corruption.

              • ours@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                But during the status quo, Putin had his hands free to finance destabilizing extremists, Internet troll armies and wage cyberwarfare on the West.

                All while reflecting an image of strength.

          • dudinax@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They have quite a lot to gain by it. Getting the other side stuck in a quagmire has been the preferred strategy for both sides in US vs. Russia for decades.

            • Kissaki@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              They would gain more by cooperation or ignoring.

              It’s just that you can’t do that when the other party is actively destructive.

              Doesn’t make it a gain in my eyes. Labeling it a gain at least requires a contextualized qualification. So saying the EU is interested in prolonging the conflict is very disingenuous.

              EU would have far more to gain ffrom Russia leaving Ukraine. Saying the EU wants to prolong the conflict for gains is disingenuous, at least misleading or ambiguous.

              • dudinax@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                What the West gains is a diminished Russia less inclined to adventure. That’s a big gain.

                The most important goal in this situation for the West is to avoid war with Russia. Since Russia has the resources to wage the war for a long time as long as the West doesn’t join it, then whether Ukraine wins is purely a Russian decision.