I plan to have the following services running concurrently on it:

  • A VPN (OpenVPN or Wireguard)
  • A very lightweight personal website
  • A Nextcloud instance (25GB storage max)
  • A Vaultwarden instance
  • An Invidious instance
  • A Matrix server
  • A Lemmy instance

I’m unsure if these would be private or public instances. But I’d be curious to hear any thoughts on how much more space I’d need for public instances too, if you’d have a sense of that.

I currently have a VPS with 2GB RAM + 50GB storage. Would that be enough? Thanks in advance!

    • mrmojo@beehaw.org
      1·
      1 year ago

      You could also check out Conduit, it’s still in beta but very lightweight.

      Conduit is a lightweight open-source server implementation of the Matrix Specification with a focus on easy setup and low system requirements. That means you can make your own Conduit setup in just a few minutes.

    • cnschn@lemmy.cnschn.com
      1·
      1 year ago

      So true, every few months I get the urge to ditch Synapse, but then I think about how much of a hassle it would be to migrate and happily pay a few bucks more for the extra RAM on the VPS. Don’t be me, use Dendrite right from the start.

  • honk@feddit.de
    3·
    1 year ago

    Does your hosting provider support scaling that up?

    This is all relatively lightweight stuff and I would guess that it could run all at the same time with the exception of matrix which is somewhat heavy.

    I would also advise you to not run all of that on the same machine especially if you run some more critical stuff like nextcloud and especially vaultwarden on there. You want that to work and you want that to run reliably and safely. You don’t really want a bug in the lemmy instance to take down your private cloud or worse someone gaining access to your vaultwarden databse.

    • piezoelectronOP
      1·
      1 year ago

      Thanks a lot – my provider does offer scaling up support. I’m also looking into swap partitions to artificially expand RAM.

      Re-having it all on one instance, do you think Docker/Podman could help containerize everything and prevent one service from taking all others down?

      • honk@feddit.de
        2·
        1 year ago

        Containerizing generally a very good idea. MIt provides security benefits in certain cases, keeps stuff organized and can prevent an application taking down other services. So yes. Definitely go for it. So I don’t have super in depth knowledge about docker. Idk if and how you can allocate and provision resources to specific containers. If for example your lemmy is just overloaded and by usage or just a bug it could issues with your other services even when running in a container.

        I personally use Linux Containers (LXD/LXC) for pretty much everything. I can use them pretty much exactly like a VM even though they are just containers using the host resources but I can provision them properly. You can SSH into them just like into a normal Linux machine.

        Speaking of linux containers there is something that you should check regardless of what container solution you want to use. With cheap VPS it is very common that you actually don’t pay for a real VM but what you have is actually a LXC (Linux Container). This is usually fine but it can cause issues when you try to run containers like docker or other LXC inside of it. It doesn’t have to but it definitely can. So you might wanna check that first. Also take in mind that you are limited to whatever Kernel the host is running.

        Another issue that I encountered when working with docker on a rented vps is that my provider didn’t offer an external firewall so I just had to use ufw on the machine itself. not a big deal in general but my docker network was not affected by my firewall rules out of the box. i don’t remember exactly what was going on but I messed around with it and could solve that. Just something to look out for.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    2·
    1 year ago

    2gb will be probably insufficient, mainly because of Matrix Synapse. If you avoid joining any large communities it might work, but if you are not doing that you might as well use a XMPP server which is better anyways.

    A small Lemmy instance will take around 500-1000mb RAM so that will likely work but use a significant portion of your RAM.

      • darkfoe@lemmy.serverfail.party
        2·
        1 year ago

        This is my droplet with 1GB of RAM only running lemmy:

        free -m
               total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
Mem:             964         386          68         141         509         219
Swap:           2047         310        1737

        So expect at least 1GB for lemmy with postgres included when you include spikes etc.

  • g7s@lemmy.ml
    2·
    1 year ago

    It’s always hard to evaluate that before, but why don’t you try setting all up and If it’s not enough RAM, just upgrade when needed? As @poVoq already said, Matrix might eat some of your 2g ram, everything else will probably not need so much.

    • piezoelectronOP
      1·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been trying to, but I only get so far as the VPN. The moment I try setting up any other service, I consistently get a 502 bad gateway error on Nginx. I’m honestly at my wit’s end. I’ve nuked the server and will try again with a clean slate and hope for the best…

  • Echolot@sh.itjust.works
    2·
    1 year ago

    2 GB RAM might be a bit close for Postgres which you need for Matrix & Lemmy. And 25GB storage is not gonna last long at all for Lemmy + Matrix.

  • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    1·
    1 year ago

    The heaviest things will probably be the postgres database(s) needed for nextcloud, vaultwarden, and lemmy. (not sure if invidious or matrix use dbs). I would say 500-1000MiB per DB, so probably around 4GiB to be safe.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      1·
      1 year ago

      Can’t you have multiple services using the same database? My understanding is that they would each do different tables and if you give each a different database user that’s not only good practice but also helps prevent them from stomping on eachother

      • cnschn@lemmy.cnschn.com
        3·
        1 year ago

        You could, but it probably wouldn’t help much. The overhead for each additional Postgres server is minimal, the RAM usage comes from each database. It doesn’t really matter if those are on the same postgres instance or on separate ones, in my experience.

  • Danacus@lemmy.vanoverloop.xyz
    1·
    1 year ago

    If you want to host a matrix server with a low amount of RAM, you could consider using dendrite. It’s not complete yet, and not bug-free, but it’s a lot less heavy compared to synapse.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      2·
      1 year ago

      You could try Yunohost. It makes stuff a lot easier but like all those solutions makes real customizations more difficult.

  • untilyouarrived@lemmy.world
    1·
    1 year ago

    I have the following running on mine:

    • WireGuard
    • NGINX
    • go2social
    • 2x static websites and a couple of fairly lightweight PHP sites
    • AdGuard Home (provides DHCP and as blocking)
    • Newsblur (in MultiPass container)
    • Docker:
      • Transmission
      • Sonarr / Radarr / Lidarr / Prowlarr
      • Huginn
      • Plex
      • Libreddit
      • Linkding
      • CalibreWeb

    And probably a bunch of other stuff, but most of it lightweight.

    Host has 16gb ram and 6gb in use.

  • Rick@thesimplecorner.org
    1·
    1 year ago

    I am running Lemmy on mine with 1gb ram. 1 cpu. Ubuntu 22.04 server. I almost run out of ram. Seen as low as 50mb. Fwiw. My experience.

    Probably will bump mine up.

    Also, I found out my VPS host doesn’t allow smtp traffic (25 or 465)… Anyone got suggestions on hosts that are cheap, reputable that allow smtp?