“We recognize that, in the next four years, our decision may cause us to have an even more difficult time. But we believe that this will give us a chance to recalibrate, and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not.”

That’s gotta be one of the strangest reasonings I’ve heard in a while.

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    So, what were trumps worda about muslims when he was president? Since youre concerned with what actually happened.

    • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      Still better then genocide. You and your fellow cohorts would be in an uproar if the exact same thing was happening if a republican was in the WH. You don’t care about people’s lives, only the one doing the killing

      • shitescalates@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        If supporting Israel is supporting genocide than Trump supports that too. Trump is one of Netanyahus strongest supporters, LOL.

        • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          I said nothing about supporting trump, I said oppose Biden. But Biden does happen to be the largest recipient of JStreet money

          • shitescalates@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            11 months ago

            Opposing Biden is supporting Trump unfortunately in our two party system. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good

              • Telorand@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                11 months ago

                How do you plan to convince people to do that? What strategy would you employ?

                Talk is cheap. Idealogues like you are glib to demand change, but y’all never have a viable plan to get there.

                • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  We do have viable plans, but have to fight fucking shitlibs 24/7 that are convinced it’s their way or nothing. Your way doesn’t work

                  • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Is your way any different though? It seems you’re just as convinced it’s your way or nothing. If the tables were turned, and a bunch of liberals were refusing to vote for a communist incumbent unless they had more neoliberal policy, would you agree that the communists should compromise?

                    Everyone’s self assured of their path being the righteous one. What actually makes them different though is if you’re willing to do the same if the tables are turned. If you aren’t, then why should you expect the same of your opponent?

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        “Me and my cohorts” you seem to know who I am. Why dont you tell me about myself, and I can explain a “false dichotomy” to you.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        You and your fellow cohorts would be in an uproar if the exact same thing was happening if a republican was in the WH.

        You’re making it obvious that you have a double-standard and are simply projecting that.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            There’s no double standard, your comment makes the assumption I advocate for a Republican

            I made no such assumption. But considering how quickly you jumped on this despite me not saying, it’s clear how much you were intentionally baiting it.

            Projecting and not arguing in good faith. Probably should be obvious from your name that you’re just a bad troll.