return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 年前Return to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1364arrow-down112cross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1352arrow-down1external-linkReturn to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square53fedilinkcross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squarepsud@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前Government doesn’t help much with court, except where they change the law
minus-squareKecessa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 年前That’s what I meant, why should we need to go to court to get that right recognized when it should be the government changing the law without court intervention?
Government doesn’t help much with court, except where they change the law
That’s what I meant, why should we need to go to court to get that right recognized when it should be the government changing the law without court intervention?