E.g. abortion rights, anti-LGBTQ, contempt for atheism, Christian nationalism, etc.

  • centof@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kudos for sharing. Feel free to ignore those who challenge your values. It takes a bunches of mental energy to argue and it isn’t necessarily worth it to argue.

    With that said, I will still would like to ask you a question, if you are up for it.

    How did you form your values?

    I only ask because it is easy, when you are raised as Christian, to uncritically accept the teaching, values, and views of those around you as your own.

    As kids we are conditioned through school, parents, and in general just information asymmetry to accept what adults say as fact and not question it. It is easy to carry that same tendency over into our values and viewpoints. Kids and adults have a hard time separating fact from opinion. We tend to treat widely held beliefs as fact instead of as the opinions they actually are.

    • Throwaway@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, abortion is basically a modified pascal’s wager. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal’s_wager

      Pro guns, all sorts of historical precedent, from the US in Iraq, to Roof Koreans, to the French Resistance, to Australia. (This is honestly my strongest belief, guns and free speech)

      Free speech, how can you speak up if you can’t speak?

      • centof@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I understand your justification for your beliefs and even share some of your moral beliefs. It seems to me like you didn’t really answer in the way I meant to communicate it. I’ll try to rephrase my original question to what I mean clearer. What causes you to rank your own values in the way you do?

        Why do you think access to guns is more important than your beliefs on abortion? Or why are they more important than not getting overcharged on everything from housing to education to healthcare?

        • Throwaway@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          TLDR: Without guns and speech, you have no rights, and I have historical evidence to back me up. But also they’re pre-crime laws.

          Simply put, the right to bear arms protects every other right. But before you grab the ammo box, you supposed to actually say something. Protest, make yourself heard. Free speech and guns go hand in hand in my mind.

          For guns specifically, guns protect rights I can point to any number of historical precedents. Even in America, gun control basically started as a way to disarm black people, and it’s still trying to keep poor people from arming themselves, and look how minorities are treated. In Nazi Germany, one of the first things they did was disarm the Jewish people. On a lighter note, Australia disarmed, and now they banned hentai. You can’t make this shit up

          Guns are powerful tools, poverty stricken farmers in the middle east held off the most powerful military in the world for decades, whether or not you agree with them. The IRA successfully kept most of Ireland independent from the UK with guns. The French Resistance wouldn’t have been able to do anything without guns. Hell, the Roof Koreans wouldn’t have saved their stores without guns.

          I can come up with more, but I think you get the point.

          It’s a similar situation with free speech. Tons of historical precedents. Martin Luther King marching for example. (I came up with a ton of examples, but I realized just how long it was)


          In any case, gun control and hate speech laws are pre-crime laws. What’s the actual issue? Murder, assault, robbery, that sort of thing. Simply owning and saying shit isn’t hurting anyone by itself. Murder should be against the law, not having a gun and not outing yourself as a bigot. It’s pre-crime, not actual crime.

          • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The comics are now regarded as “illegal pornography,” following fears of child porn being brought into the country.

            How the fuck did you go from “they banned guns” to “so what’s stopping them from banning child porn, when they take your guns away!”

            Holy shit you’re a sick dude.

            • Throwaway@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              They didn’t ban child porn, that was already banned. What they banned was all hentai. It’s ridiculous.