• SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    This article replaces the “Google is cracking down on ad blockers” mantra with “Google is consolidating control by restricting general purpose computing as the model of security”.

    Honestly, I’m not sure this is a better look. It’s true that this is “more secure”, in the sense that it limits the power afforded to malicious extensions, but it completely ignores the collateral damage. It strips the power individuals have to enact their own policies, instead having to go through Google to accomplish the same thing.

    Honestly, this is just another step in the direction of WebDRM and centralized control. This is more erosion of what made the Internet great. It’s just one more step of turning the Internet into a TV set.

    Fuck. This. Shit. Give me back web 1.0.

    • amio@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      it completely ignores the collateral damage

      I don’t think so. I try to not be overly “conspiratorially minded” but I’d 100% believe in a millisecond that the “collateral damage” is the point all along here. Google is pushing constantly for more control and this is just another item in the long-ass list. After massive pushback on Manifest 3, they “cancelled” it a while back and now they’re right back pushing it again.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m honestly surprised that YouTube hasn’t enforced DRM all these years. Is it that technically complex?