• AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The king is profiting from the deaths of thousands of people in the north-west of England whose assets are secretly being used to upgrade a commercial property empire managed by his hereditary estate, the Guardian can reveal.

    The Duchy of Lancaster, a controversial land and property estate that generates huge profits for King Charles III, has collected tens of millions of pounds in recent years under an antiquated system that dates back to feudal times.

    The Guardian identified dozens of people whose money has been transferred to the king’s hereditary estate after they died in the north-west in places such as Preston, Manchester, Burnley, Blackburn, Liverpool, Ulverston and Oldham.

    A Duchy of Lancaster spokesperson indicated that, following his mother’s death, the king endorsed the continuation of a policy of using bona vacantia money on “the restoration and repair of qualifying buildings in order to protect and preserve them for future generations”.

    However, under a custom that has its roots in the medieval period, two hereditary estates, or duchies, belonging to the royal family can collect bona vacantia from people who die in two regions in England.

    “The king reaffirmed that money from bona vacantia should not benefit the privy purse, but should be used primarily to support local communities, protect the sustainability and biodiversity of the land and preserve public and historic properties across the Duchy of Lancaster estates,” the spokesperson said.


    The original article contains 1,518 words, the summary contains 232 words. Saved 85%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • anlumo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uh, they’re his subjects, he can do as he pleases. They should be thankful that they were allowed to handle his belongings while they were alive.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    Revealed: US Secretly profiting off the assets of dead citizens (I.e. estate taxes exist)

    • d00ery@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe this is different. We also have an Inheritance Tax which is a tax on a person’s estate when they die.

      However this is the Royal Estate taking all of the inheritance for people who don’t have a will or any known relatives. Usually in this scenario it would instead go to the govt., thus, eventually, benefiting everyone and not just the Royal family.

      • erusuoyera@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also, Charlie was exempt from paying inheritance tax despite inheriting an entire fucking empire simply because he was the lucky spaff of his cousin-fucking dad.

        • FishFace@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t really make sense to have inheritance tax on the crown estate, thought it could have done on the Duchy of Lancaster.

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is the key aspect:

        The Duchy of Lancaster’s website states that “proceeds” of bona vacantia go to three registered charities after costs are deducted. However, its accounts suggest only 15% of the £61m it has collected in bona vacantia over the last decade has been donated to charities.

        That’s basically fraudulent.

        They are within their legal rights but the British taxpayers already do a lot for them through pure goodwill, and they are trespassing on that goodwill.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a huge difference between a state charging taxes, or even a state inheriting when there’s no other legal heir, and the head of state personally taking property for their own profit.

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If Joe Biden and his wife were appropriating US estate taxes to renovate their private rental properties for personal gain it would probably be controversial too.

      • Lophostemon@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Funny how Trump neve gets pulled up by his base for all his corruption. They probably can’t spell it, for a start.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        US estate taxes help maintain the primary residence of Joe and Jill - they help fund staffing for the Whitehouse.

        I agree that these situations are quite different but that article title was outrageously sensationalist and vague.

        • livus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure. That’s normal. But they’re not renting out the Whitehouse and putting the proceeds into their personal bank accounts as private income.