• ByteWizard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      You joke but those and helmet laws all should be repealed. We need to stop protecting people from Darwin. When the stupid assholes can’t cull themselves naturally it drives the average intelligence downward.

      We see the results of this in modern society with the number of iPhone owners. No one should want an iPhone but marketing is all it takes for the stupid to be convinced.

      • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        When the stupid assholes can’t cull themselves naturally it drives the average intelligence downward.

        And yet … here you are.

        • qfjp@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Only because he’ll get a ticket if he’s caught not wearing his seatbelt.

      • poopkins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        …until you’re personally involved in a fatal accident—even if by no fault of your own—where the other party would have survived. Post traumatic stress is no joke. I don’t think we should aspire to have a society with more suffering.

        • ByteWizard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol. Forcing people to do your bidding just ‘in case’ someone dies in your vicinity. What a tyrant.

          • poopkins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The argument I’ve made is that I don’t wish to personally suffer psychological damage because of somebody’s death. We don’t allow others to inflict harm in other ways, and this is in my opinion no different. It has nothing to do with tyranny.

            • ByteWizard@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No, you’ve demanded other people restrict themselves so that you are spared the ‘chance’ of “personally suffer psychological damage because of somebody’s death”.

              Pretending your demands have no consequence on others isn’t a valid defense. It’s pure selfishness expressed as tyranny.

              • poopkins@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                What an absolutely absurd position you’ve chosen to take on this. I can only hope for the sake of compassion that this is not what you actually believe.

                • ByteWizard@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  "Forces others to do their bidding and draws on ‘compassion’ to justify it. "

                  Narcissism defined folks.

                  • poopkins@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You’re quoting yourself. I never said any such thing and you’ve completely misrepresented my position.