• Kalkaline @leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      89
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do people think that there can’t be two bad guys in a story? This isn’t a good vs evil fight.

      • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do people think that there can’t be two bad guys in a story?

        You’re not going to like the answer…

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Really disappoints me.

          In some ways, this might reflect the futility of multi party systems. At the end of the day, coalitions of multiple groups are still split into two camps of government and opposition. We have to stop seeing every conflict as us vs them.

      • 4lan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is a war between two terrorist organizations, one of them is funded by the United States.

        We are funding terrorism. Your tax dollars are going to infant murder.

        • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          To not kill babies and people in hospital care. Innocent life is never worth the victory, no matter what the propganda has told you.

          • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            When you have time to get off your unicorn and enter the mortal realm where the rest of us live, please present to us a plan to solve this conflict that results in 0 dead kids. We are waiting, as is your Nobel peace prize.

            • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              So because I don’t have the solution to fix everything with a neat little bow on top kids should die? Nice

            • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              “We cannot guarantee children will not die so any suggestion we take actions to avoid it as much as possible are entirely unrealistic.”

          • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You think those babies were getting the medical help they needed? All the fuel and supplies being redirected to Hamas fighters and their control of the building making normal work impossible was killing kids - I bet they’re much better off with it run by idf than Hamas.

      • AnyProgressIsGood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s literally war. Become a general/propose a way to kill /apprehend people that look like civilians while hiding in civilian places

    • 11181514@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think Hamas is hiding inside your house. What, do people think Hamas wouldn’t hide inside your house?

      • AnyProgressIsGood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        They look just like the public and fighting from where the public lives. What is Israel to do? Just accept getting massacred.

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Does getting massacred justify massacring tenfold? I’m pretty sure the United States emmisaries had this very conversation with the state of Israel.

          The thing is, Hamas and Hesbollah see provoking Israel to disproportionate reprisal as a worthwhile gambit. They know Netanyahu is glad to enact genocide justified by retaliation to terror. But now the world will get to watch the horrors of war under Israeli jackboots. And it will be ugly, and the world may have opinions about the Israeli state doing ugly things. The general opinion from the international community is changing. Along with the US’ unconditional support of a regional bully.

          There are better ways. But Israeli state has rejected all alternatives, and is glad to throw stormtroopers into the mix.

          And yes, the people of Israel, by a significant majority don’t want an overkill response. They want a path towards peace. But the far right does like us vs. them dynamics to consolidate power. It’s the same playbook Trump uses.

          I’m not an expert. I don’t know how to fix this, but the experts were shown the door, so here we are. 👀

            • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              When Israel massacres civilians and massacres disproportionately, it then loses the peace. It also reveals its administration is too immature to deserve international support. The indiscriminate brutality of the IDF will reflect both on the the legitimacy of Israel and its allies, hence the conditions now added to US materiel support.

              I’m very glad you don’t have any responsibility in this or any state affair.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      ok but if they’re hiding in a hospital you dont need to bomb it? or do anything to it? hiding is not hurting anyone.

      • rchive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        For conflicts like this leadership that is planning attacks or otherwise leading forces that are doing attacking, simply existing anywhere outside a prison cell is threatening. Hamas leadership knows that, they’re the ones putting hostpitals at risk by being there.

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          right, but my point is, however inconvenient it is, we always have a choice not to bomb hospitals. People take human shields, you don’t have to shoot through the human shields.

          Do I have all the answers? No, but people go to school for war. Surely this has come up before at some point in the last 20,000 years?

          • rchive@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You certainly should do your best to not shoot through human shields, agreed. But can it still sometimes be better to shoot through human shields if that’s what it takes to get very dangerous people vs letting them escape and threaten again later? I don’t know, it’s a hard question.

      • AnyProgressIsGood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depends. Are they artillery spotters. Are they leadership trying to claim to be in a safe you can’t tag me zone. Did they just momentarily hide their guns too. Ya gotta secure that shit one way or another otherwise you’ll get another massacre.

        There are no good answers