• DarkGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If polling is accurate, they will be voted out soon enough. To remove Hamas one needs the ammo box, as they have removed the ballot box as an option.

    • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      True, but it doesn’t require killing civilians to accomplish. Just assassinate the Hammas leadership until there’s no one left who wants to risk it. Mossad is pretty good at tracking people down.

      Cut off the head and the body will die.

      But, that’s pretending that Israel just wants to protect itself instead of looking for an excuse to genocide.

      • GingerHobbit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        OOOoh now I understand! Just kill Hamas, it’s easy! Wish we’d thought of that sooner. Wow, war must be a breeze. No innocents ever die in wars!

        If we wanted a genocide it would have happened a hell of a lot quicker. Bombing the places where the refugees are gathered, for example, instead of telling them to get out of harm’s way.

        The whole situation is fucked, and war is fucked. There are no easy answers.

        • Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Finally someone that gets it… People think fighting those terrorists is just like a computer game, where the objective is simple and doable. Just stroll on and kill all of the Hamas leaders, which are conveniently located in the same room. Cue the ‘boss fight’ music!

          They don’t understand how these people operate.

          • gever4ever@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean they sometimes literally march civilians in front of their troops in active combat. It doesn’t help that their fighters are sometimes dressed as civilians, either.

            The IDF also has to guard those humanitarian corridors themselves otherwise Hamas would shoot down all those trying to evacuate.

            If Israel didn’t care about civilian deaths the war would be over on October 8th.

        • jorge
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If we wanted a genocide it would have happened a hell of a lot quicker

          In one month and a half, Israel has killed 1 out of every 200 Gazans. For comparison, the death toll in Gaza is about 11000 civilians, while the death toll in Ukraine is 9700 (in 19 months). Isn’t that quick enough to you?

          Bombing the places where the refugees are gathered

          instead of telling them to get out of harm’s way.

          …only to bomb the people who are getting out of harm’s way: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/live-blog/israel-hamas-war-live-updates-rcna120252 https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/16/middleeast/israel-palestinian-evacuation-orders-invs/index.html https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/why-is-israel-attacking-south-gaza-after-telling-people-go-there-2023-10-25/

          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If we wanted a genocide it would have happened a hell of a lot quicker

            In one month and a half, Israel has … [many examples of less than total war]

            Your examples are clearly designed to create outrage, but you haven’t invalidated their point with your statistics or articles. Israel could have killed everyone in Gaza immediately were they so inclined. They are a nuclear power. They have access to many munitions and tactics they haven’t used and probably will never use.

            IDF has been clear that they will attack legitimate Hamas targets anywhere. Yes, even under refugee camps. Yes, even in the south.


            • Jalabia was in the evacuation zone. IDF has warned that anyone remaining will be considered potential enemy targets, and according to them there was a tunnel network with valid military targets underneath it.
            • According to your link, the only source for the attack on Al-Maghazi refugee camp is Hamas, which is not credible. It has not been verified by 3rd parties.
            • jorge
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              So, we have to be grateful that Israel hasn’t dropped a fucking nuke, how magnanimous! Not to mention the little detail that nuclear fallout doesn’t care about borders. A nuke in Gaza would kill hundreds of thousands in Israel.

              The previous comment tried to argue that Israel wasn’t committing genocide because they didn’t bomb refugee camps and because they evacuated the population, and I showed that both of the claims are false. The rest is you moving the goalposts.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      And the IDF will bomb as many civilians as they need to to remove them from power!