He’s openly plotting to persecute his enemies, assume kinglike powers, and deport millions of people. But at least we’ll all have flying cars!

Many of Trump’s proposals for his second term are surprisingly extreme, draconian, and weird, even for him. Here’s a running list of his most unhinged plans.

  • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
    1·
    11 months ago

    We were in the legal definition of the term age discrimination, and what i said above is what’s relevant there.

    Race is a terrible analogy

    But both can be reasons for different treatment and in that one particular feature, they are the same, thus the sound analogy.

    Age discrimination (in a legal sense) is different treatment because one particular feature (age); racist discrimination is a different treatment because of a particular feature (race) as well.

    In that they are the same, the different degrees of legality of both were not in question here.

    • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
      1·
      11 months ago

      But both can be reasons for different treatment and in that one particular feature, they are the same, thus the sound analogy.

      No, sorry, it remains terrible. In the same way stealing a candy bar and murder aren’t analogous simply because they’re both illegal. Although, at least in that analogy both would always be illegal. In your analogy, disparate treatment based on age can often be valid and permissible, well disparate treatment on race can never be.

      • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
        1·
        11 months ago

        Age: can be a reason? Yes. Race: can be a reason? Yes.

        In their can-it-be-a-reason property, they are identical - both can be reasons.

        I honestly don’t care whether they are good reasons or bad reasons each, you’re mostly right in that discussion, but that is not part of this discussion.

        • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
          1·
          11 months ago

          Smell: yes. Height: yes. Hair style: yes. Food choice: yes. Suit color: yes. Religion: yes. Party: yes. Education: yes. Speaking style: yes. Gender: yes. Handedness: yes. Weight: yes. Place of birth: yes. Sports team affiliation: yes. Personality: yes. Previous employment: yes. Name: yes. Ethnicity: yes.

          ^^^ They all fit as well as yours, since they can-be-a-resson. TERRIBLE ANALOGY! The only connection is so broad that a thousand other things can apply in the same way.

          • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
            1·
            11 months ago

            Okay, let’s go through the checklist:

            Is age a possible criterion one can base the decision to treat someone differently on? Yes. Is this true for race? Also true. One can conceivably treat others differently due to their race.

            Do such different treatments have specific names? Yes, age discrimination in one case, racism in the other.

            Are there laws in place that forbid treating others differently due to their age in certain contexts? Yes, in the workplace for example, that is illegal. Are there laws in place that make treating others differently due to their race illegal? Yes, there are multiple contexts, where that is illegal.

            Are there contexts where one can definitely make decisions based on race? Yes, absolutely - for example one can choose to not vote for a candidate due to their race (it’s an absolutely irrational dick move, but no authority will sanction that decision). Can one consider age a disqualifying factor in certain decisions like for example voting, dating, etc too? Yes absolutely.

            I don’t see how that analogy is lacking in any way, except that the range of laws declaring each illegal differs, but you may not find another factor that has the exact same range of situations covered. What would you consider a better analogy that ticks all these boxes?