JoYo@lemmy.ml to Fediverse@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoFor my Fediversery, a reminder that NSA and CIA were probably on the fedi before you werewww.vice.comexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up118arrow-down15
arrow-up113arrow-down1external-linkFor my Fediversery, a reminder that NSA and CIA were probably on the fedi before you werewww.vice.comJoYo@lemmy.ml to Fediverse@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareThe Doctor@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoNSA? Yes. CIA? Probably not. They don’t have that kind of imagination. c.f., the internal parody of The Hunt for Red October they declassified about a decade ago.
minus-squareJoYo@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agofair, I think JWICS was for DoD only.
minus-squareThe Doctor@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI don’t think JWICS is DoD only. In theory, any TLA or FLA that handles TS material, has a SCIF and a local JWICS LAN can’t be hooked into the rest of the JWICS network.
minus-squareJoYo@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoI thought NSA had a completely different one called Tapioca. /shrug
minus-squareThe Doctor@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIt wouldn’t surprise me. The definitely have a need for their own entirely separate network.
NSA? Yes. CIA? Probably not. They don’t have that kind of imagination. c.f., the internal parody of The Hunt for Red October they declassified about a decade ago.
fair, I think JWICS was for DoD only.
I don’t think JWICS is DoD only. In theory, any TLA or FLA that handles TS material, has a SCIF and a local JWICS LAN can’t be hooked into the rest of the JWICS network.
I thought NSA had a completely different one called Tapioca. /shrug
It wouldn’t surprise me. The definitely have a need for their own entirely separate network.