• Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    302
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The title looks like it’s trying to imply that the thiefs specifically targeted her, when the article makes it more clear that they likely just tried to steal the car not knowing it was from the Secret Service.

    Gotta add that clickbait for the views 🙄

    • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It could be just breaking in and it’s a coincidence, could be that they thought they were in the car or were trying to threaten Biden’s family. The fact that they got away from the secret service, who don’t fuck around, is wild too.

      Edit: I took out the part about d’s being targeted in the article. I read the description.

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        85
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        smaller detail has to stay on task–protecting their charge, not chasing down suspects that are no longer an immediate threat. others will do the hunting.

      • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The immediate goal is to protect. They aren’t going to chase them down. MPD is going to find these guys almost certainly.

      • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        where in the article does it say that democrats are being targeted? In addition, I feel user Ragdoll is correct that the title makes it seem worse that the situation actually was (though I guess there isn’t an easier way to write the title), the SUV was not occupied when the criminals tried to break in. If you’re targeting someone, you probably at least have an idea of who should be inside and whether they just stepped out of the vehicle or stepped in. I doubt the vehicle literally said Biden or “Biden’s family inside” so I doubt it was a group of people walking around, and taking the opportunity to attack Biden or his family. In addition, the article indicates that car jacking have increased 40% in the area, so it really seems like it was a random car jacking.

        I kind of think the bigger story is, why were Secret Service shooting at suspects trying to enter an empty vehicle? Unless there were firearms in the vehicle, feels a bit excessive to potentially kill 1 to 4 people over a car break in where no one’s life was in direct danger.

        Maybe there’s more missing details that clear up the story so we’d have to wait and see.

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sad thing is, it probably would have generated as many hits if the headline was more open. I mean that’s freaking hilarious in a morbid way - that the would be thieves just happened to pick the wrong car to try and steal.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Secret Service Fires Shots at Car Thieves

          But we don’t do non sensationalist headlines anymore.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          You just made me realize that the original headline doesn’t specify that the SUV is where the granddaughter is. You also make that mistake.

          I think we can do better. Let’s see:

          Secret Service open fire at thieves who unknowingly attempted to break into SUV carrying Biden’s granddaughter.

          And I still think we can do better, but right now I’m le tired.