• npz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Software developer. Having my home constantly phoning home to megacorporations sounds creepy, but more importantly, none of these smart home products solve a problem. They just add additional points of failure to appliances that have historically been sufficiently reliable.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Software developer. The frequency of stupid features that PMs request, followed by our urgency to implement it as fast as possible has opened up so many bugs and issues. Knowing that, why the hell would I want to open up potential failure to things I expect to work 100% of the time, like a toaster?

      • whatwhatwutyut@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Software programmer. I have a Google Home running because I’m lazy af and like to be able to verbally turn on/off lights. I also use it to combat ADHD symptoms because saying “set an alarm” is less likely to distract me from what I’m doing than pulling out my phone is.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Indeed. Like what is fridge? Motor with piston in a puddle of oil and a thermostat. Why the fuck it needs any corpo bullshit?

    • flames5123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Smart lights solve a problem. I have LEDs with programmable scenes that I can swap to easily. I don’t have white light constantly on all times of the day.