(message original en anglais)

traduction par Argos Translate:

Vivaqua a retiré leur machine à sous et refuse maintenant de l’argent. En effet : pouvoir accéder au service d’eau à #Bruxelles dépend désormais de l’acceptation par la banque et de l’acceptation des services bancaires.

  • freedomPusherOP
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t even think employers would agree to pay you in cash today, for security reasons.

    It depends on your career. And strangely enough, the law makes career type a factor. Cash wages are legal in industries where that norm is established such as domestic work. It would be unusual for a white collar worker to be paid in cash and because it’s unusual, it’s illegal. There’s also an unusual law in Belgium, France, and Spain that prohibits B2P cash transactions over €3k. So even if all workers had an equal right to receive cash those whose paychecks exceed €3k would still have a problem.

    (I had to break my reply into 3 parts because the lemmy form just goes to lunch if there’s too much text)

      • freedomPusherOP
        link
        fedilink
        Français
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s just an example where I heard cash wages were normal. The law is strange because it just says cash wages are acceptable if it’s the norm in an industry. The law does not list industries where that’s a norm, so if someone is prosecuted someone would have to convince a court whether or not cash is normal for the line of work.

        • Camus (il, lui)@jlai.luM
          link
          fedilink
          Français
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bank transfer are just more convenient.

          Cash wages are used when people (sometimes on both sides of the transaction) are trying to avoid the law: off-the-grid constructions, waiters, etc.