• MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wouldn’t it be more efficient to use algae for that and stuff the slime directly in the borehole?

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Possible not, you need to maintain the growth conditions for the algae, that has some meaningful energy cost.

        • Aleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I actually helped research this as an undergrad. The problem we’d always face is there are certain microorganisms, like rotifers, that can just decimate a tank of algae. Many rotifer species are parthenogenic, so it literally only takes one rotifer to knock out an entire algae tank.

          • oatscoop@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What if we genetically modified the algae to be impossible to kill and survive in extreme conditions. Like the algae equivalent of kudzu.

            • runefehay@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Now coming to everyone soon: algae world! All algae all the time! Covered in slime? That’s worth a dime! There is no escaping it, not even a bit.

              • oatscoop@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’ll be fine.

                If it gets out of hand we’ll just engineer an equally hardy and aggressive rotifer to kill all the algae.