The virtual school says its hands are tied due to Florida’s “don’t say gay” law. However, the teacher has lodged a complaint against it.

  • ABCDE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or get rid of these titles altogether, they don’t serve much of a purpose and I stopped using them a long time ago.

    • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What if some people prefer to use them them? That seems counterproductive if you respect how people want to be referred.

    • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      No why would we force or encourage other people to NOT use their preferred titles. If there are no practical downsides, just let people do what they want.

        • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve skimmed the thread and I don’t see any compelling reasons. Could you cite some?

          I am 100% supportive of trans rights, but using precious political will, energy and attention to pressure non trans people to stop using gendered titles is a hugely divisive distraction.

          • ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            That the thread exists shows that there are downsides (to expand upon what I meant). I would say my perspective is that if you remove the barriers we have imposed upon ourselves, there is less to divide. Removal of gendered labelling for bathrooms, and making Mr/Ms/Miss/Mrs (which is inherently biased against women) obsolete would allow for names to take precedence instead of your ‘status’.

            • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              The existence of the thread is not an argument. Thats just intellectually dishonest. You wouldn’t tolerate such lazy argumentation from someone who says that they want to impose gendered titles, and the existence of a thread discussing it is “proof” enough.

              You’ve now provided a different argument: you claim it removes divisions. Except this is very divisive. Just leave people alone: let people use their gendered titles, and let others not use them!

              • ABCDE@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                How so? Someone was fired over their usage of Mx. How is removing gendered titles divisive?

                • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You think that the answer to not allowing someone to use their preferred title is to not allow someone to use their preferred title?

                  • ABCDE@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Using neutral language, yes, like neutral bathrooms. The title is a way to be neither, and no title achieves the same result.