• fosforus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    When somebody breaks a window, GDP grows. Hence GDP is just a guesstimate towards how the economy is functioning.

    • tb_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Forgive my terrible sources, at least I had something rather than throwing a random claim to the void.

      • nbafantest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Government spending has propped up GDP during COVID, which is inline with Keynesian economics.

        But we are seeing the effects of some of that years later. Is higher interest rates better than a huge depression? Probably.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          the problem is that one small group is holing the rest of us hostage, we needed to do the whole spending to ensure people could continue to afford food/housing etc… and that ended up going to everyone, just when it comes to repaying it, the hostage takers threatened to upend the economy if they have to pay it back, so it falls on the rest of us.

          record profits as the average American is struggling to get by

        • SwampYankee@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Government spending is not the root cause. If that was the case, we would have seen inflation much sooner, since we’ve been in the era of quantitative easing ever since 2008. The fed was starting to raise interest rates even before covid because the post-2008 recovery was turning into an expansion; we are still in that expansion phase, and covid fucked up our supply chains which kick started the inflation that would have accompanied the expansion regardless, but would have been easier to control in normal times.

      • fosforus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Are you calling what I commented a random claim or referring to something else?

        • tb_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I edited my other reply for a bit more context, in case you missed it.

          That said, maybe I misunderstood your claim and with “the economy” you were referring to the prosperity of the average person.

        • tb_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes. No doubt the economy took a hit at the start/height of the pandemic, but using that as a blanket statement to explain the linked article is unsubstantiated.

          Edit:
          Could also read the article.

          The poorest 40% of households suffered an 8% drop in cash savings and the middle 40% (the U.S. middle class) also saw their bank deposits and other liquid assets topple. Only the wealthiest 20% of households are still enjoying the extra cash they stockpiled during the pandemic, with their savings about 8% above where they were in March 2020.

          Given the American wealth distribution in 2023, just the top 10% of people hold 69% of wealth.
          The article mentions the top 20% saw their savings increase.
          I think it’s fair to extrapolate that America “as a whole” got richer (e.g. the economy is “doing better”), at the small cost of 80-90% of its inhabitants.

          The pandemic has been a disaster for the average person, yet the wealthy used it as another opportunity to exploit them.

          ^(sidenote, “stockpiled” is a very apt descriptor…)