Corporations are a lot more willing than usual to raise their prices lately, and it’s putting more of the burden of high inflation on consumers.

That may not come as much of a surprise to anyone who has browsed a grocery aisle, kicked the tires at a car dealership or filled up a gas tank of late, but even the Bank of Canada is starting to take notice of the trend, as the central bank continues its battle to wrestle inflation into submission.

Speaking to a parliamentary committee in Ottawa this week, the bank’s governor, Tiff Macklem, told lawmakers that the bank has noticed a troubling new trend coming out of the corporate sector.

For much of the past few decades, any time businesses have seen a jump in their input costs — the amount they pay for things like raw materials, energy and even workers — “they were pretty cautious about passing on [that cost into] the prices they charged for goods and services,” Macklem said.

Their reasoning was simple: they were afraid of losing customers.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not “it makes inflation worse” - the correct term is “it makes inflation”.

  • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Shockingly, when you don’t come down hard enough on price gougers during a global pandemic, the rest of pf buisnesses get the idea you’re unwiling to punish anyone for price gouging.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah I’m not buying the claim that corporations have ever been any less than 100% willing to raise prices as much as they can.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the inevitable conclusion of allowing oligopolistic conditions to be formed.

      With enough competition, companies are afraid of that one competitor who doesn’t raise their prices. This limits their price increases to actual cost increases instead of higher profits.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The idea they were driving at is that, decades ago, that limit was actually imposed by the consumer. Nowadays they know people will just blame Trudeau or Biden or whoever and make excuses for the rich so there’re no more barriers. They also have a much stronger foothold than before and so don’t need to worry as much, and many of the modern scummy tactics, such as McDonald’s running anti-suing propoganda, are exactly that, fairly modern.

    • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s definitely been more aggressive price raising since COVID started since I think businesses discovered that they can push it a lot further than before.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes exactly. They discovered that they (now) can push it a lot further than before. Their desire to isn’t new; the opportunity is.

        So the question is, what changed about the businesses’ environment that allows them to raise prices?

        In my worldview these two are big factors:

        • Pandemic lockdowns killed lots of businesses. Business assets and market share were consolidated as big survivors swallowed the remains of small failures. “Failures” is a bit harsh considering the circumstances; I only mean it in the technical sense: not able to continue, so they sell.
        • Pandemic lockdown mitigation in the form of huge quantities of cash pumped into stock market created a huge pool of cash in rich peoples’ portfolios, and over time it seeps into the active economy diluting the value of money
  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s unspoken collusion amongst publicly traded companies is what it is. Instead of competing against each other on price, they have all just been price jacking for profits and in today’s corporate world of massive companies that all own a dozen subsidiaries there’s no new competition for virtually anything that can come in and start competing with lower prices, so there’s no fear of being undercut by a new player and they’re all happy to all raise prices and keep most of their customer base instead of trying to compete against whatever tiny handful of companies are in their sector to expand their customer base.

    Just look at home appliances. Whirlpool owns the Jenn-Air, Maytag, Amana, Roper, and KitchenAid. There’s only a few other major corporations that make appliances and they’re all publicly traded companies that have all raised their prices well over inflation.

  • athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    for the 20 years leading up to 2022, corporate profits were responsible for about one-third of inflation. Last year, however, that ratio jumped to two-thirds, which means that despite legitimate increases in their cost of doing business, their take-home share of every consumer dollar effectively doubled.

    Record profits everywhere - except for employees and consumers.

    Advice for consumers for much of the past year has boiled down to either trying to cut back on expenses, or increasing income, but Stanford says it’s misleading to put the onus on consumers to solve inflation, since they’re the ones bearing the disproportionate burden of it.

  • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hey, everyone. You don’t show up to the semi finals without practicing and think you’re going to accomplish anything else but getting dunked on.

    You can’t just wait around and then react when bad stuff happens. You need to practice and organize and scrimmage throughout the year. Then when the big day arrives, you all know what to do.

    Start small, and grow your action. Started by building channels to coordinate actual group actions/boycotts. Tell all those bots that work real hard to tell us all to just ignore their collusion instead of organizing. Then start picking off small players with organized boycotts. Build momentum. Start fucking stuff up over super minor inconveniences to scare the ever loving shit out of these companies trying to pull bigger schemes.

    You would think we didn’t have a massive communication channel attached to our hips ffs

    • CulturedLout@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wouldn’t picking off small players just make the problem worse? We’d have even less options than we do now.

      • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        By less options do you mean options like

        Option A that steals your data,

        Option B that funds union busting or

        Option C that actively contributes to manufactured scarcity.

    • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The sheep can’t hear you over the sound of munching grass. The cattle have no care for what their bells say.

      You show me how to eradicate wilful ignorance and deliberate belligerence and I’ll show you a functional society.

      You would think we didn’t have a massive communication channel attached to our hips ffs

      It might as well be a broken translator.

      • totallynotarobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        My translator doesn’t have the “pompous cliché” language pack installed so I’m afraid idk what you said there.

            • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              If normies are wilfully ignorant and intentionally belligerent, then yes. Anyone with an iota of cognizance would have disdain for that. But don’t cry about being what you are.

              • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You can argue about willful and intentional. Political corruption gives evil people a means with which to undermine education. Not a hard concept.

                • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Lack of education undermines democracy, wilful ignorance undermines personal intelligence, deliberate belligerence undermines communication.

                  Ones own ignorance can be eliminated by their own actions alone.

                  To remain uneducated is to hate democracy.

  • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where I live there’s only one company responsible for public transport for the whole country/state/province and they have increased fares for busses by 7% and are now increasing train fares for most adults too (not the elderly though) just only young people and people below retirement age being affected and there’s no support for decreased fares for people in poverty or jobless or disabled. Prices had been frozen for about a year or two because of “cost of living” yet money is going less further this year because wages haven’t kept up and goods are still expensive so the least well off is going to be hit harder by the increase to public transport.

  • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every dollar of profit is a dollar exploited from the the supplier, the worker, and the customer.

    • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m getting an MBA right now and that is exactly what I’m being taught. There’s a bunch of flowery bullshit around it, but value extraction is the modus operandi.

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    One of the products we use at our business is going up about 25-30%

    We are locked in to contracts that last 3-5 years. We will be eating that cost for awhile now.

  • dislocate_expansion@reddthat.comB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    the definition of inflation is too much currency going after too few goods, all of this blaming the companies or the workers shows the hand of the writer not understanding basic capitalist economics. so the writer is most likely either ignorant or a shill

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a bad trend. I suspect a lot of times when a business raises prices, it is a long overdue increase so that tends to make the increase more. If it’s a lot of work to raise prices they probably raise them a lot now so they won’t have to do it again in X months.

    • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That boot leather is addictive for some. They raise them as far as the market will allow constantly. In the last few years they’ve been testing the hell out of it.

      • dan1101@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I have experience with small business, they don’t do much testing. They are often reluctant to raise prices but when they finally do it tends to be a big jump.