• PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hot take: none. Let information flow free. Take it with the good and the bad. Don’t lock yourself in an echo chamber.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      93
      ·
      1 year ago

      i never understood this take. echo chambers aren’t inherently bad; forced debates are never good. communities are supposed to be places you go to feel comfortable not where you’d forced to debate or turn anything into an argument.

      • stevehobbes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exposure to other viewpoints is good. No need to debate. And if you’re on a large instance, you’ll see that. Not everyone thinks alike, there are shades of gray. Discussion is allowed to happen but intolerance isn’t tolerated.

        The tankie instances ban anyone for even asking questions politely that they don’t agree with. It’s a total monoculture and I assume they’re mostly still kids, because everything is black and white and can be solved without any nuance at all.

        • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exposure to other viewpoints is good yes, but is it good when that exposure only ever gets you insults hurled your way from the people you’re trying to have a discussion with?

          • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            exactly. everywhere irl all i see is people debating my existence. i just want one place where i don’t have to think about that. x.x

          • stevehobbes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nope, definitely not - which is why I’m not a free speech absolutist. Let those instances sit on an island by themselves.

          • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Is exposure to other viewpoints good when those viewpoints are half-baked straw man hot-takes that the users are just parroting because they heard their favorite YouTuber say it?

            I don’t need to be exposed to yet another dipshit who insists the holodomor never happened. That’s not me avoiding other viewpoints, that’s me avoiding fucking morons.

        • SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is very close to the Nazi point of “just asking questions” or when they say it’s just free speech. Not saying you’re arguing it, but it is a very thin line.

          What’s the line then? Why do people ban Nazis and not tankies? Tankies are authoritarian, they defend the massacre of Ukrainians, the Uyghur genocide, and other historic “socialist” atrocities. Why do we give them leeway? Are they skirting the line just enough? Are they intentionally using the optics of socialism to do so? Etc.

          Keep in mind, just because someone blocks someone or an instance it doesn’t necessarily make the space an echo chamber. We don’t know if they live in a state or work in a place that is blasting Fox News 24/7. They may be very active on Twitter exposed to that sewage. Heck, the liberal point of view is quite a lot as is with the way they are defending Israel.

          • stevehobbes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think I’m arguing the exact opposite. We should ban/defederate nazis and tankies. But we shouldn’t ban people with different views that aren’t beyond the pale.

            You can have a nuanced opinion of Israel/Palestine without being labeled as a genocide denier since it’s still in the fog of war.

            It’s much harder to have a nuanced opinion about Rohingya, the Holocaust, Uyghur, Darfur.

        • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I assume they’re mostly still kids, because everything is black and white and can be solved without any nuance at all.

          This is SO important. Remember that the “Dirtbag Left” a la Chapo et al. was created when the Alt Right was running rampant in high schools. Their goal was to attract young people to the left. Which is great! There’s a place for cringe edgy teens to feel like they can fight for a better world. But I’m really not looking to hang out with arrogant teenagers right now, and definitely not with their emotionally immature adult chaperones.

        • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The fact that they are mostly kids is a big part of the reason why I feel the need to add context to their bad political science.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sometimes questions have answers.

          Exposure over and over won’t be novel, or helpful, just grating. We do not need to endlessly rehash every possible argument, over and over and over and over and over.

        • Nerorero@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even if the other viewpoint is that trans people should get shot or locked up and are members of a secret child sex ring? I don’t think I want that on my feed. I don’t want people that want to kill me on my screen while I shit

          • stevehobbes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nope, not at all. All that falls into the intolerant and intolerable category.

            Defending capitalism or Israel - or even suggesting that both sides might have agendas - will get you banned in quite a lot of subs here.

            • Nerorero@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay, but this is more about blocking instances that are very extreme. Those can most of the time not be discussed with

          • stevehobbes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nope, not at all. All that falls into the intolerant and intolerable category.

            Defending capitalism or Israel - or even suggesting that both sides might have agendas - will get you banned in quite a lot of subs here.

      • Y|yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        90% of the time it’s bigots who are upset that they’re getting deplatformed. The other 10% of the time it’s the incredibly idealistic or naive. Either way it’s a crap argument. You are under no obligation to endure verbal diarrhea, nor is it your responsibility to change the minds of the people spewing it. They shit the bed, they can lie in it.

      • WillFord27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Normal interactions with normal communities will be plenty of diversity, there’s absolutely no reason to engage with or listen to nazis. Right wing politics has mastered brainwashing, it’s dangerous to read that shit too often.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They’ve mastered brainwashing to conservative religious nutjobs and incels. Maybe young and naive teenage boys, on top of that. If you aren’t an idiot or a teen, you should be immune for the most part.

          Not that I’m saying you should go out of your way to interact with Nazis. Unless the interaction involves punching.

          • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you aren’t an idiot or a teen you should be immune for the most part.

            Yes but the problem is between idiots and teens you’ve covered about 70% of the population.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hot take indeed.

      If the dog shits on the floor you don’t just start walking around it, you clean the floor.

    • seathru@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not so hot take: My time is finite, why force myself to see shitty facebook memes, dog pictures, crusty “battlestations”, etc.?

    • tastysnacks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hexbear kind of pissed me off for a week. But I kind of like how nakedly transparent they are. Now, whenever I come across one of those threads, I see where its coming from and I relax. They’re just pro-russia regardless of if it makes sense. I don’t know what the Murica equivalent of Russia is, but they’re that

      • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re anti US, not necessarily pro Russia. They support Russia in the Russia-Ukraine war because they think Ukraine is a US puppet state because the country wants to align with Western nations, and of course no nation on earth has its own agency and everything is the US’s fault. They’re pro anything that challenges the US and other liberal countries.

        They remind me of a bunch of teenagers trying to be edgy.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are campists. It’s been the bane of leftist parties forever. That’s why socialism really got a foothold in Europe via third-way social democracy, because it doesn’t feel the need to make tyrants into folk heroes in order to relitigate the cold war

    • SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would you say the same when someone is harassing you? Or how about if they were Nazis? Because keep in mind OP is just blocking them and not removing them from all of lemmy.

      • Microw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        OP is asking which ones to block because he currently is not being harassed. If he was being harassed, he would know which ones to block.

    • Kedly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’d be fine if the tankie takes had any value to them. The only value they’ve added to me is showing me why real world communism has always ended up the way it has. And now I’ve learned that lesson, so theres no further value

      • Tug@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same here, but every now and then an English source comes through so I keep them available.

      • Microw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh mein Gott er kann kein Deutsch lesen grundgütiger wie kann man das nicht können c’est incroyable, non c’est impossible je voudrait penser mais non

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I like getting exposed to languages that I’m not fluent in. Sometimes I pick something up or get curious and learn something new from translation. A multilingual internet is a colorful and beautiful place.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      My hot take is: Depending on the individual, this may be a healthy and responsible thing to do. The outrage cycle that was established in commercial social media to “drive engagement” is very bad for our meat computers (shown in multiple studies). It is much healthier and more productive, at times, to block users, communities, and potentially instances (removing this ability, and forcing me to use their algorithm for sorting, is why I left Reddit, in addition to the harm caused to disabled communities).

    • Tug@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree, I would love to block NSFW instances, and I’m grateful to the users that voluntarily post in there. For me Lemmy is too searchable for me to get into those luxuries.