You probably already know this, but you need to keep a lookout for where the articles are actually sourced from. Just because multiple sources are reporting on something could simply mean they are affiliated outlets publishing the same story from the same original author.
This saves time for affiliate outlets, but it’s a practice that is vulnerable to the rapid spread of misreporting or intentional misinformation.
Huh? That’s so ridiculous it can’t possibly be true.
Can we get another source?
Edit: yeah. This is also reported by plenty of other sources.
If you read the article, they link to a tweet where he discusses it at length on video.
You probably already know this, but you need to keep a lookout for where the articles are actually sourced from. Just because multiple sources are reporting on something could simply mean they are affiliated outlets publishing the same story from the same original author.
This saves time for affiliate outlets, but it’s a practice that is vulnerable to the rapid spread of misreporting or intentional misinformation.
deleted by creator
No.
You got blasted because you tried calling a local newspaper a non-credible source despite it being proven it was very credible.
You just didn’t like that it was a left wing site and wanted to discredit it. You failed hard and you’re still moaning about it days later.
You’re getting blasted because you didn’t bother to read the “unbelievable story”, which contained a link to exactly what you asked for.
The fucking giraffes? Unbelievable. I got nothing.
deleted by creator