I don’t see refenece in this article or any others, but how did prosecutors get access to SBF’s Signal messages?

Was it simply a court order that he unlock his phone (and agreed), or a codefendant who flipped to the prosecution and handed over the thread?

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    One of the co-defendends in the group chat starting taking screen shots when the writing was on the wall, I believe that is what I read earlier

    The threat model guides say it many times, but its easy to forget, even if signal works perfectly the people your talking to can compromise you… by taking screen shots, using a second phone to take photos of the first phone, hooking up a audio recorder to record voice conversations, etc.

    We also saw this behavior in some of the political trials post trump. Signal + screenshots.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2023/10/19/read-the-secret-signal-messages-that-could-help-put-sbf-behind-bars.html

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly you can just use a modified signal client that doesn’t delete messages. When you send something to someone you need to trust them.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      None of the screenshots had self destruct timers, so I’m not sure how they were using signal… kinda looks like signal desktop

      more of the screenshots arnt cropped, they do have disappearing message timers, but they are using signal desktop, which doesn’t do local encryption. So those disappearing messages are still on disk floating around…

      (Signal desktop AFAIK has a terrible security posture, not secure at all)

      • essteeyou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Signal desktop doesn’t even have a PIN to unlock it. IIRC the reason was that if someone is already on your machine then you’re screwed.

        I just want it to stop someone like my son, who may have access to my computer legitimately, from seeing some of the NSFW messages me and my friends send each other.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just make a separate user acct for the kid. That way your stuff is separate and you can also implement parental controls if needed.

          • essteeyou@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, we have separate profiles, but sometimes I just let him use some software on mine, like a game, or whatever, and then I go and do something else. The use-case is there, along with encrypted messages, but people say things like what you said because they don’t personally have that use-case.

            I’d look at implementing it myself, but they wouldn’t merge it, and I’m not going to maintain a fork indefinitely.

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              For your use case, running a VM on your desktop should be sufficient. The VM could have disc encryption. So when you’re letting somebody else use your terminal, they can’t access your interesting messages.

              Hyper-V has this built in I believe, QEMU does it as well, UTM on Mac OS makes it pretty easy. But there’s a thousand different ways to skin this cat

      • ikiru@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there a way to clear messages from the disk other than by deleting the Signal Desktop app itself or is that sufficient?

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not really. Once data is written to disk it’s more or less there forever. At least from a risk perspective.

          If your disc is encrypted, you can change the disc encryption key, throw away the old key, then it doesn’t matter that the data is there you no longer have the key so the date is lost.

          Most people use full disc encryption, and they’re unlikely to want to throw away all of their data just for signal.

          Unless you’re using a container to run signal, or a virtual machine, or qubes : with disc encryption, then anything signal writes to the hard disk is more or less there forever from a risk perspective.