• billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      They seem to forget one of the main reasons people founded this country in the first place. Freedom OF religion includes freedom FROM religion.

      • Instigate@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The US Constitution was set up and amended in such a way that religions could not be interfered with by the state, but such that religions could invade the state and exert influence there. It’s not so much a Freedom from Religion as it is a Freedom for Religious People. Goddamn puritans.

        • spaceghoti@lemmy.oneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, that’s what Barton wants people to believe. But when you read what the Founders had to say about church and state, they made it pretty clear they wanted to keep religion out of the state as well.

          “The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.”

          - John Adams

          The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus by the Supreme Being in the womb of a virgin, will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter. … But we may hope that the dawn of reason and freedom of thought in these United States will do away with all this artificial scaffolding…

          - Thomas Jefferson

          meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and the Mohammeden, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination.

          - Thomas Jefferson again

          If they are good workmen, they may be from Asia, Africa or Europe; they may be Mahometans, Jews, Christians of any sect, or they may be Atheists…

          - George Washington, to Tench Tilghman, March 24, 1784, when asked what type of workman to get for Mount Vernon, from The Washington papers, edited by Saul Padover

          …I beg you be persuaded that no one would be more zealous than myself to establish effectual barriers against the horrors of spiritual tyranny, and every species of religious persecution.

          - George Washington, to United Baptists Churches of Virginia, May, 1789 from The Washington papers, edited by Saul Padover]

          For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support.

          - George Washington to the Hebrew Congregation in Newport, Rhode Island | Wednesday, August 18, 1790

          While we are contending for our own liberty, we should be very cautious not to violate the rights of conscience in others, ever considering that God alone is the judge of the hearts of men, and to him only in this case they are answerable.

          - George Washington letter to Benedict Arnold | Thursday, September 14, 1775

          More on what the Founders thought.

          • Instigate@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Surely if they wanted to keep religion out of the state, they’d have written that into the Constitution or one of the early amendments, right? It’s not like they didn’t have the power to do so. They specifically chose not to, knowing that their government could easily invaded by religion, which indicates at least that they were ambivalent to the idea.

            Those quotes are all well and good but what matters is the letter of the law. These men wrote the law, and the law doesn’t forbid religion in the state. It doesn’t matter what a politician says, but what they do - and what they did allowed for what we’re seeing today. It was obviously on their minds as they spoke about the idea of wanting to keep church and state separate, but then they did nothing at all to safeguard the state - the only protections are for the churches.

            They were either in favour of the church being able to control the state, or wilfully ignorant that this could happen unless it was forbidden in the Constitution. If they wanted to stop this from happening, they would have.