• uberkalden@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    60
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol, downvote this guy for pointing out that it might not make sense for your company to pay for your personal projects

    • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe because it’s a wise investment to encourage knowledge workers gain additional experience working on things they enjoy even if you might not be able to pick up one of those things and directly make another revenue stream out of it.

    • hibsen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t, but I get why. It’s a specious argument — it doesn’t matter if 99% of them are useless. It matters if the 1% that become ubiquitous for whatever reason provide utility that makes the useless ones worth it.

      Yeah you can run a company that never provides any time or resources to tinker, but only if you’re okay with innovation never happening again.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Plus, for that other 99%, the developers probably tried out a new framework or language or something. They aren’t claiming to “know” something based on watching a YouTube vid. It wasn’t wasted time.