• creamed_eels@toast.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      One sentence: shooting are bad

      Three paragraphs: but trans people competing in sports is a huge issue that isn’t addressed properly in today’s confused society full of the dangers of trans people competing in sports, destroying a whole category of sports because the trans people competing in sports are competing in sports

    • Remmock@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why not let the governing bodies for the sports themselves make that distinction and then allow the schools to follow suit? To assume someone would transition purely for a sporting advantage of some kind is asinine.

      • Deykun@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        41
        ·
        11 months ago

        The reasons a person transitions don’t really matter if they do it later in life and can benefit from it.

        • Sacha@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          Transitioning is incredibly traumatic for the body (and mentally) you are not as strong after the fact as you were before.

          This argument has existed before Trans. I rememberan Olympic sprinter opened this debate. She had more masc hormones than average. She didn’t take masc hormones, she didn’t drake performance enhancing drugs, she wasn’t Trans. She was just born with more than the average male hormones than the average woman and there was a debate on if that gave her an unfair advantage.

          Every time you people shift the goalposts, you shift them even more when it’s finally met. If a naturally born woman gets the same argument, when will this argument end? When women can’t compete in sports at all? Back in the kitchen taking care of house and family?

          • Deykun@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            This argument has existed before Trans. I rememberan Olympic sprinter opened this debate. She had more masc hormones than average. She didn’t take masc hormones, she didn’t drake performance enhancing drugs, she wasn’t Trans. She was just born with more than the average male hormones than the average woman and there was a debate on if that gave her an unfair advantage.

            Yes, it’s a valid counterargument to what I’ve written. Defining a woman is hard.

            Every time you people shift the goalposts, you shift them even more when it’s finally met. If a naturally born woman gets the same argument, when will this argument end? When women can’t compete in sports at all? Back in the kitchen taking care of house and family?

            But I see that being reasonable didn’t work for you in the long run.

            • Sacha@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Its hard to be reasonable when you won’t and keep taking our rights away, you people are always shifting the goal posts to meet your own personal ends of what a woman should be.

        • Remmock@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          See: The first sentence of my statement.

          You are so obsessed you won’t deign to admit it’s irrelevant to lawmaking while the deaths of thousands every year doesn’t even register in this conversation to you.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      the issue of people transitioning (mostly men to women) after puberty to have an advantage over their female competitors.

      Who cares?

      It’s high school sports. They should be out having fun, not obsessing over which of them will make it into the fucking Olympics.

    • ElectricMeow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      There should be no issue if the trans woman underwent hormone therapy to having cis female levels of testosterone. No one is going to seriously push for trans women to play sports when they have all the biological advantages to beat women. But once they allow their physical form to transition, I’d argue they’re on the same level as the cis female population, if not at a disadvantage since cis women might produce more testosterone. Testing could be done to ensure validity.

      We also don’t care if men have significant genetic advantages. I don’t think it’s as big of an issue as people are making it seem.

      • Deykun@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’d argue they’re on the same level as the cis female population.

        I would oppose that statement. You can balance hormones, but there are differences in how men grow taller, gain muscles while using different hormones, and fat distribution is different for different genders, with fat located in different places. These things don’t disappear after transitioning completely. The trans community would love that because it would improve their lives and they wouldn’t be misgendered as often, but it’s not how it works for people after puberty.

        • ElectricMeow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I’m sorry, but considering that I actually took hormones once when I questioned my gender and then realized I’m cis and stopped, I can’t agree. I literally tried it because I believed ideas like what you are saying and I liked the idea of keeping most of my strength. But that’s not the case.Not having testosterone makes you so incredibly weak. HRT basically forces your muscles to atrophy overnight if it works. Your ability to apply strong force with your hand just disappears. All the shit you grew in male puberty doesn’t matter because the medication will just change it. Anything leftover from masculinization will be cosmetic. Maybe they won’t be as weak of a woman as they would have been if they were born female, but they will still enter a range of strength that is typical for women, and often weaker than many. And all of this reverts if they stop. It did for me. And I was 23 so I’m pretty sure I was after puberty. I simply cannot believe the idea that trans women are always stronger than cis women after my experience. I get that most people just don’t have any actual experience with these things, but the misinformation is horrifically bad. I strongly feel like a lot of straight women in sports/people in general are just transphobic and would look for any reason to disclude them from sports and are willing to die on the hill they made because it’s not about being correct or fair to them. It never feels it’s really about how fair things are in reality.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Ελληνικά
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I really think the issue of trans people in sports should be up to the governing body of the sporting organization. It’s not really something the federal government should be concerned about.

    • darq@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You’re aware that trans people generally have been allowed to compete, with restrictions, already, right?

      You don’t need a large population with that advantage to put them all on the podium.

      So why hasn’t that happened? Trans people have been allowed to compete already, but all these terrible scenarios we keep getting warned about just haven’t come to pass.

      And we know that because there are like 5 cases of trans women competing and winning things that get brought up repeatedly by TERFs for years. If trans women “dominating” women’s sports was so frequent an occurrence, conservatives wouldn’t be foaming at the mouth about a trans woman placing 6159th in a marathon.

      It’s not advisable to allow trans people in those categories because removing them later from that would be inhumane.

      That ship has long sailed.

      This is literally just a wedge issue. A nothing burger that they have convinced you is important. Its only purpose is division.