IBM researchers said a ChatGPT-generated phishing email was almost as effective in fooling people compared to a man-made version.

  • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be honest, phishing emails are so bad that I don’t see how any generational AI couldn’t be better. Just making less than two typos per sentence would e enough.

    Someone explained me that it may be intentional that phishing emails are so bad as it acts as a pre-filter, then you only spend time and ressources dealing with presumably very gullible people.

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The typos are intentional. They filter out intelligent recipients who wouldn’t fall for the scam.

      • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The typos have been theorized to be intentional (for that reason), but that isn’t the only theory, and afaik those theories aren’t based off conversations with the people crafting those emails.

        It’s also been theorized that phishing emails frequently have typos (intentionally) to lower people’s resistance to well-crafted phishing emails, particular spear phishing.

        There’s also the fact that many phishing emails are crafted by people for whom English is not their first language, and even given that, phishing emails are still better written than spam emails, so it’s quite likely that in many cases it isn’t intentional at all.