• RonSijm@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yea true, if people can vote on something, other people will use those votes as metrics for how good something is

    My perspective was more about what they actually do. Not the meta-effects they might have socially

    Eventually, you will be able to turn a repository with a high star count into money or advancement

    I think you overestimate how much money or advancements you can really get from it though.

    Money wise - I can’t find an overview of “Most Sponsored github repos” - but it’s pretty bare. I checked to see if I could find any example, for example if you look at FluentAssertions - A project that basically everyone uses, has 292.6 Million total downloads on Nuget. If you check their sponsers - they currently have 17. Assuming their the lowest tier, you’re getting $85 a month. Which is cool, I guess, but a neglectable amount for a developer with a normal job

    And advancements wise - any actually good developer doesn’t really have a problem getting a good job - And any good company reviewing a candidate might fool the HR by buying stars, but a dev reviewer or something will actually look though the code won’t care much about stars

    • ck_@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And advancements wise - any actually good developer doesn’t really have a problem getting a good job

      True, but I’d assume developers who are actually good also don’t buy stars on Github. Sadly, the demand on the market over the last five to ten years meant that everyone with a udemi course in react could get job as a developer. Now that the economy does not look all that rosy, that is changing and people are looking for new ways to “boost” their CVs.