Doesn’t change the fact that these apps are trained on stolen data, and soon, when they’re sued into oblivion, they’ll be forced to credit artists in a meaningful way.
When artists can’t even figure out what was stolen they really have no leg to stand on. Complete cluelessness of how any of this works doesn’t help either.
And beside these kinds of arguments are just complete hypocrite bullshit to begin with. Human artists use references all the time. If the law decides that that’s illegal, they’ll be in even deeper trouble than they already are.
Also the only one that would profit from these lawsuits would be Adobe, Shutterstock and all the other mega-corp content hoarders out there. You’ll be stuck with AI image generation all the same, but instead of it being free and available to everybody, you’d be paying a hefty subscription fee to them.
Either way, AI image generation is the way forward. The genie is out of the bottle. Get used to it
Sure Jan.
Doesn’t change the fact that these apps are trained on stolen data, and soon, when they’re sued into oblivion, they’ll be forced to credit artists in a meaningful way.
When artists can’t even figure out what was stolen they really have no leg to stand on. Complete cluelessness of how any of this works doesn’t help either.
And beside these kinds of arguments are just complete hypocrite bullshit to begin with. Human artists use references all the time. If the law decides that that’s illegal, they’ll be in even deeper trouble than they already are.
Also the only one that would profit from these lawsuits would be Adobe, Shutterstock and all the other mega-corp content hoarders out there. You’ll be stuck with AI image generation all the same, but instead of it being free and available to everybody, you’d be paying a hefty subscription fee to them.
Either way, AI image generation is the way forward. The genie is out of the bottle. Get used to it