• Syrc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s pretty much all competitive games unfortunately.

    “Join League of Legends and try its 165 Champions of which only 40 max are worth playing at any given time!”

      • Syrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll admit I never played that one, but it really doesn’t have “that handful of weapons/loadouts/whatever that are competitively viable and overshadow all the rest”?

        • ApfelstrudelWAKASAGI@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s different to competetive games mentioned here because a) at least like 70% of guns are competetively viable b) they are all meaningfully different and c) they allow for a wide array of different tactis that makes the game really fun to watch and play. Obviously there is a meta, but that meta changes and encompasses a lot of things.