Concerns don’t mean it’s a problem, just that it was identified as a possible problem. Did this study bear these concerns out? From the article, right between two of the paragraphs you copied:
Sun-Ways has tackled these issues by building more resistant panels than what would be installed on rooftops, fitted with an anti-reflection filter.
Also, yes, install them on houses. We can do both. We should keep putting them just about everywhere they work until there is no added benefit or there is no more fossil fuel being used for electricity.
Concerns don’t mean it’s a problem, just that it was identified as a possible problem. Did this study bear these concerns out? From the article, right between two of the paragraphs you copied:
Also, yes, install them on houses. We can do both. We should keep putting them just about everywhere they work until there is no added benefit or there is no more fossil fuel being used for electricity.
I still dont understand why it’s so important to have them along rail lines. Why not just build a regular solar farm?
It’s to awe the masses, there is no other benefit.
The space and right of way is already procured, and the space between the tracks can’t be put to other beneficial use.
Sure if we can do both! But it seems like lots of easier options are still untapped in many places, like the sides of the rail right of way.