• Shadow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or they’re a tool to give the employee some quantifiable and measurable areas they need to improve on. This way both sides are clear of expectations and there’s no surprises.

    Not all bosses suck. I’ve had to put a few people on them and they’ve helped, never had to fire someone afterwards.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s certainly a possibility, but if someone told me they were put on a PIP, and asked me what they should expect, I’d tell them that in all likelihood it means that they are going to be let go in the near future.

      It’s a different story if the company does regular performance management with all employees. For example I work in the public sector and we do annual performance reviews, but also annual performance agreements, which are basically PIPs but without the prerequisite that performance has diminished.

      • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They literally said “never had to fire anyone”

        But… ok, sure let’s go with your “interpretation”

        • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah you just don’t get it. Firing is a capitalist invention designed by the elite to keep the population down. Everyone is an excellent employee and every manager everywhere is getting a bonus and poorly utilizing team skills.