• TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    And what do you do with the filter?

    They are breaking these compounds down to their constituent elements and then recombining them to make salts used in industry. If all of that is true, it sounds much better than using filters.

    • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe do both? Capture the chemicals with the filters And then send the filters to a plant to be broken down.

    • Thisfox
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perhaps the filters should be the things being cooked and broken down.

    • roguetrick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What do you with activated carbon? You bury it. It often comes from sustainable charcoal itself. It’s actually GOOD for the environment.

      • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not the charcoal that’s the problem, it’s the PFAS it absorbs. You don’t want those in the ground.

        • roguetrick@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Taking it out of the water and getting it bound up with activated carbon is a net benefit. Much less chance of it leaking back out when stuck in the carbon compared to when it was already in the water.