InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world · 11 months agoYouTube cracking on ad blockers.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square653fedilinkarrow-up11.19Karrow-down150
arrow-up11.14Karrow-down1imageYouTube cracking on ad blockers.lemmy.worldInternetCitizen2@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square653fedilink
minus-squareMadrigal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·11 months agoI wouldn’t object to paying if: Their pricing was more reasonable A fairer cut went to content creators They had something that actually qualified as a search function on their site They weren’t trying to bully everyone into paying
minus-squareN-E-N@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·11 months agoI think the price is very fair if you split the family plan with others Also I think creators get a 55% cut for ad revenue which seems reasonable to me
minus-squareGabu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-211 months agoYou’re joking, right? Creators make the whole video, Youtube only has to serve it. Also, not all creators get money from ads, so Youtube gets to STEAL from the little guys.
minus-squareN-E-N@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-211 months agoYou realize that serving the video is incredibly expensive right? There’s a reason Lemmy doesn’t support video hosting They also pay for hosting the thousands of videos from “little guys” that no one will watch
I wouldn’t object to paying if:
I think the price is very fair if you split the family plan with others
Also I think creators get a 55% cut for ad revenue which seems reasonable to me
You’re joking, right? Creators make the whole video, Youtube only has to serve it. Also, not all creators get money from ads, so Youtube gets to STEAL from the little guys.
You realize that serving the video is incredibly expensive right? There’s a reason Lemmy doesn’t support video hosting
They also pay for hosting the thousands of videos from “little guys” that no one will watch