• dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree completely. Uniforms have been proven to not help with anything they claim to. For one, they generally can’t be bought second hand.

    • jasondj@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Dude if you’re a parent with a friend group of other parents in your school district, there will absolutely be hand-me-downs going all over the damn place.

      My kids have so many clothes that they’ve never worn because we just keep passing clothes around, between their friends and cousins, everyone is growing so fast, it’s foolish to be spending a ton of money on brand new clothes unless we need something for a specific special occasion.

      I’m sure school uniforms, as long as they are consistent, would be swapped around. I’m sure there would be parent groups forming on Nextdoor and Facebook to swap clothes. And I’m sure they would show up at the thrift stores.

      Secondhand uniforms would not be a problem.

      But honestly the most important part is that schools don’t treat it as a fundraiser. They should be able to buy in bulk and coordinate with neighboring districts on selection to maximize discounts, and sell at slightly above cost in order to offset free/reduced cost outfits for low income families.

      In other words, in theory, it should be less expensive to dress your kids in school uniform.

      Personally I think uniforms solve a lot more problems than they cause. They sacrifice a bit of self-expression (at least the older kids, who mostly dress and style themselves), but at the same time, it takes a big hit out of financial inequality bullying. Combined with universal lunch programs it basically destroys it.

      That in itself is worth it. Kids getting bullied (or feeling empowered, for that matter) for things 100% out of their control (like the caste they’re born into) shouldn’t be a thing.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Private schools are not public schools. Impoverished cannot afford private schools. And Uniforms are not interchangeable.

        • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ed choice has enabled many kids to attend private schools, tutition is actually less than the cost per pupil that that public schools cost.

          • Smoogs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wtf is Ed choice. Oh. another ‘only American’/scholarship-rewarding-elites thing again. You’re using ‘many’ very liberally.

      • EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you are going to a private school, it’s kinda implied money isn’t a huge issue anyways. Your parents are paying for you to attend this exclusive school, after all.

        But you can’t take Johnson Academy’s uniform to Brentwood. So, if Brentwood isn’t having a sale, what then?

        • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ed choice has enabled many kids to attend private schools.

          Kids grow and their uniforms don’t fit, giving them to the school to resell as a fundraiser or giving them directly to other students is common. On top of that most private schools do not have embroidered cressents on their uniforms so they can be used interchangeably. Private schools are different than what you see on TV.