The history of science and technology is marked by major breakthroughs—the theory of evolution, the splitting of the atom, the development of antibiotics—and a research team including faculty at Binghamton University, State University of New York, has developed a method to help pinpoint discoveries that reshaped the course of science.

below quotes from the paper

At the same time, it is crucial to acknowledge that “disruptiveness” should be evaluated in a multifaceted way. For instance, the work by Kohn and Sham (62) was identified as highly disruptive by both the original disruption index, once its structural artifact is accounted for (see section S5), and our metric. These works proposed a calculation scheme to solve quantum mechanical problems for the structure of molecules with many electrons, making previously unsolvable problems accessible and opening new avenues in the study of materials and quantum systems.

One may see this contribution as developmental as it cemented a previous theory through a novel computational tool; others may argue that this work eclipsed the previous literature and established a new practice by proposing a new method and therefore is highly disruptive.

This ambiguity illustrates that disruptiveness does not correspond to a single, uniform phenomenon but instead en-compasses multiple ways in which scientific work can reshape its intellectual landscape. Because of this heterogeneity, different operationalizations (e.g., EDM and the disruption index) may emphasize different facets of influence; instances where EDM and the disruption index diverge are not merely discrepancies but informative signals.

…

Despite these limitations, we demonstrate that our metric is a useful way to operationalize the idea of “disruptiveness.” The demonstrated reduction in degeneracy, consideration of the entire network structure, and the ability to identify collective and simultaneous disruption cases underscore its efficacy and robustness. Given the wide usage of disruptiveness in characterizing scientific progress, our metric may offer valuable insights into the diverse mechanisms driving scientific evolution. Furthermore, its ability to identify the simultaneous disruption may facilitate the investigation into the drivers of innovation and recognition dynamics of scientific works in the scientific community.

link to open access paper…

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adx3420

___