San Francisco says tiny sleeping ‘pods,’ which cost $700 a month and became a big hit with tech workers, are not up to code::The pods, which are 4-foot-high boxes constructed from wood and steel, made headlines after tech workers praised the spaces.

  • OrangeJoe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m glad it worked out for you. And I also know that my idea of it all can’t possibly apply to every single company that was or is a part of that whole culture.

    I just find myself sceptical of it all since I much prefer to have my own time, and my own space as separate from work and the people I work with. And perks like that just very clearly seem designed to get me to spend as much time at work as possible.

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really think that it started as real perks to attract a lot of talent, and slowly got morphed and abused into a way to siphon minutes out of employees lives.

      • hansl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It kind of started when Google, Apple and others started colluding to keep wages low by refusing to hire each other’s talent. They’ve been found guilty of that and I got a nice check of about 10$ plus a pinky promise they wouldn’t do it again. Yeah!

        • V H@lemmy.stad.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It started before that. In '98 I remember having dinner with someone who worked at Netscape before then who told me about how a co-worker had just been fired for living in the office, something they’d apparently decided to do in the first place because they already then had all of these perks designed to keep them in the office.

          The Google, Apple etc. collusion certainly was a huge step up in abusive practices, though.