• gayhitler420@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you really want the short version:

    Systemd was half baked literally when it came out and figuratively as an idea, so much so that there’s already a replacement for it in the works.

    A longer version:

    Systemd replaced the init script style of boot and process management, which had been in place for decades. init scripts were so simple they could be understood just by looking at the name: the computer is Initialized by Scripts. Systemd was much more complex and allowed many more tools to interact with the different parts of the computer, but people had to learn these tools. Previously all a person had to understand to deal with the computer was how to edit a text file and what various commands and programs did. After systemd a person has to understand how to use the dozens of invocations of systemctl and it’s variants and if they are dealing with a problem, —you know, the only reason a person would ever be dealing with initializing services— they gotta know what’s going on with the text files that systemd uses to run different commands and programs.

    So a person who already understood what was going on might rightly say “hey, this systemd thing is just the same shit with different file locations and more to learn”.

    People complain about the creator and maintainer of systemd, lennart poettering . Poettering is also the person behind pulseaudio, an powerful but complex audio management daemon in Linux whose name you only recognize because it’s caused you no end of trouble. Pulseaudio was also replaced relatively quickly by pipewire.

    The argument could be made (and probably has) that poetterings work is indicative of the problems with foss developers working as employees of major companies with their job responsibilities inclusive of their foss projects. The developer in that situation has an incentive to make big sweeping changes, they’re being paid for it after all, instead of being more careful and measured.

    When every big foss maintainer is trying to find a way to justify being paid for it, their projects are never done.

    At least poettering is working for Microsoft, ruining windows now…

    E: oh my god I forgot about the binary log files! So before (and now), the universal format for log files was plain text. You know, because it’s a log that’s text. Systemd uses binary log files that need a special tool to open and parse. So if you want to look through them on a computer without that tool you’re kinda screwed. Now systemd isn’t the only software package with binary log files, but many people have made the very persuasive argument that it’s not a trait to copy.

    E2: actually spelled the man’s name right. Thanks @floofloof@lemmy.ca !

    • Chobbes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pulseaudio was also replaced relatively quickly by pipewire.

      I really wouldn’t say that… PulseAudio has been around since like 2004, and PipeWire’s initial release was in 2017 (13 years later). I don’t think PulseAudio was incorporated into most distros by default until like 2007 or so, but that’s still 10 years before PipeWire was even released. PipeWire is only recently becoming the default in popular distros. We’ve had to deal with Pulse for a long time.

      • gayhitler420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s horrifying. I was just writing from memory and resisting pulse for a few years after it was sort of the defacto standard.

      • Sinthesis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh man you reminded me of bad init scripts that would prevent you from getting to multi-user login. I hope you remembered your root password so you can get into single user mode!

    • K0W4LSK1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      gayHitler420 taught me something today. thank you for this informative comment

      • Jimbob0i0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except it is clearly written by someone who just despises it, and doesn’t really know what they are talking about.

        Init scripts were awful… they varied by distro and frequently were the source of odd problems.

        There’s a good reason the Linux industry moved away from them to other ways to handle initialisation of the system and service management.

        • elscallr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          They weren’t that bad. You had to look in like 3 places, depending on the distro, but you could find them. And you could see exactly what they were doing once you found them.

          systemd gets a job done but I’d much prefer something simpler.

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      pulseaudio, an powerful but complex audio management daemon in Linux whose name you only recognize because it’s caused you no end of trouble. Pulseaudio was also replaced relatively quickly by pipewire.

      PulseAudio never gave me trouble but I guess I’m just lucky or some shit. Also PipeWire took forever to come out.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In games after I press button to shoot, animation plays and then eternity later comes shooting sound when animation ends. JACK compared to PA is super responsive in games, direct ALSA reduces lag by additional 15ms.

    • motsu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, to add on as well as summarized this… Linux has historically had a design methodology of “everything is a file”. If your not familear with the implications of this, it means your command line tools just kind of work with most things, and everything is easy to find.

      For instance, there’s no “registry / regedit” on Linux… There’s just a folder with a config file that the application stores settings in. There’s no control panel application to modify your network settings… Just a text file on your OS. Your system logs and startup tasks were also (you guessed it) sinole filea on the system. Sure there might be GUI apps to make these things easier for users, but under the hood it reads and writes a file.

      This idea goes further than you might assume. Your hard drive is a file on the file system (a special file called a block device). You can do something like “mount /dev/sda1 /home/myuser/some_folder” to “attach” the drive to a folder on the system, but that special block device (dev/sda1 in this case) can be read and written to byte by byte if you want with low level tools like dd.

      Even an audio card output can show as a file in dev (this is less the case now with pipewire and pulse), but you used to be able to just echo a raw audio file (like a wav file) and redirect the output to your audio device “file” and it would play out your speaker.

      Systemd flipped this all around, and now instead of just changing files, you have to use applications to specify changes to your system. Want to stop something from starting? Well, it used to be that you just move it out of the init directory, but now you have to know to “systemctl disable something.service”, or to view logs " journalctl -idk something.service" I dont even remember the flags for specifying a service, so I have to look it up, where it used to just be looking at a file (and maybe use grep to search for something specific)

      • ammonium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Want to stop something from starting? Well, it used to be that you just move it out of the init directory, but now you have to know to “systemctl disable something.service”,

        That is still the case, nothing stops you from manually moving a file and its dependencies into or out of /etc/systemd/system/

      • Sysosmaster@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Systemd flipped this all around, and now instead of just changing files, you have to use applications to specify changes to your system. Want to stop something from starting? Well, it used to be that you just move it out of the init directory, but now you have to know to “systemctl disable something.service”, or to view logs " journalctl -idk something.service" I dont even remember the flags for specifying a service, so I have to look it up, where it used to just be looking at a file (and maybe use grep to search for something specific)

        not true, SystemD still uses files for this very reason…

        and what is the last time you used the text version of a syslog.8.xz file?

        you are basically complaining that you need to learn how your system works… before you can use it. and there is nothing preventing you from making your own distro that doesn’t uses SystemD, or using rSyslog instead of systemd-journal for logging.

        incidentally, to just view the logs its journalctl -xef (see https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/journalctl.1.html for what that means) it will be like the syslog you know.

        want to see the status of a daemon : systemctl status want it for the system systemctl status want to see the logs of only a specific daemon journalctl -xefu . this all, means that its easier to find the logs for diffrent services since there not scattered somewhere in the /var/log dir… (is it in the syslog, does it have its own log file, is it in the kernel log)…

        You are free to setup your system in whatever way you like… but whining about that something works differently is “Microsoft mentality”… lets leave that with them.

      • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Systemd flipped this all around, and now instead of just changing files, you have to use applications to specify changes to your system. Want to stop something from starting? Well, it used to be that you just move it out of the init directory…

        Enable and disable just create symlinks of the “just changing files” files in your example. It tells you this every time you install something that enables a service.
        Want to do it manually? ln -s (or rm the link to “disable” it).
        Want it to happen later in the init sequence? Put the link in a different .target directory.
        All “systemctl enable” does is put the symlink in the target directory that’s specified in the Install section of the unit file.

        As for “specifying a service”… Everything is a unit file (yes, file), journalctl -u just means “only show me logs for this unit”.
        There’s no flag for “specifying a service”, you just type in the service name. If there’s any ambiguity (eg. unit.service and unit.socket), you type the service name followed by .service
        A flag you might find useful is -g, which means “grep for this string”. You can combine this with -u to narrow it down.

      • HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not the really the point of your post but I personally tend to use journalctl -fu something.service. That brings you to the end of the logs for that unit and I get to smile about flipping off systemd.

    • ammonium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      init scripts were so simple they could be understood just by looking at the name: the computer is Initialized by Scripts. Systemd was much more complex and allowed many more tools to interact with the different parts of the computer, but people had to learn these tools. Previously all a person had to understand to deal with the computer was how to edit a text file and what various commands and programs did.

      It’s complex because it solves a complex problem. before people had to hack that together with complex init scripts, now they can let systemd do the hard work.

      A comment from an Arch Linux’ init script maintainer: https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/4lzxs3/comment/d3rhxlc/

    • doktorseven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The log files only have binary markers within the text. You could run the raw log files through strings and get the plain log files with everything important intact.

    • Sysosmaster@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pulseaudio was also replaced relatively quickly by pipewire. lets check that, shall we:

      PipeWire: Initial release 20 June 2017; 6 years ago source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PipeWire

      PulseAudio: Initial release 17 July 2004; 19 years ago source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PulseAudio

      so “relatively quickly” is a time span of 13 years in your idea… or the difference between 2004 and 2017.

      if that’s your level of detail… your whole “rant” is worthless…

      But lets be generous and look into it,

      init scripts were so simple they could be understood just by looking at the name

      this is blatantly false, for the old system you need to know about runlevels, what they mean, how the half backed init annotations work, and its dependency check works.

      ### BEGIN INIT INFO
      # Provides:          myrec
      # Required-Start:    $all
      # Required-Stop:
      # Default-Start:     2 3 4 5
      # Default-Stop:
      # Short-Description: your description here
      ### END INIT INFO
      

      you needed special tools to watch if an application actually was running and not crashed, and to keep it running.

      add to that that the difference between systemd.service file and a sysv / init / initd script is more or less the same complexity (just different standards).

      the universal format for log files was plain text false, the universal format for logging was plain text…

      which is currently (slowly) getting replaced with structured logging. (which is objectively better, imho). there are a number of different log formats, most use a binary (compressed) format. logging to plain text was generally only used for the most recent log entries. a binary format for logging, as long as there’s is tooling to get it to a (structured) textual output, is better than a pure text log. I mean, if its good enough for MySQL / MariaDB it ought to be good enough for you…

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pottering is also the person behind pulseaudio, an powerful but complex audio management daemon in Linux whose name you only recognize because it’s caused you no end of trouble. Pulseaudio was also replaced relatively quickly by pipewire.

      Powerful? No, JACK is more powerful and was created 2 years before pulseaudio.

      For context back then OSS was primary audio api, and unlike ALSA it did not have software mixing. So sound servers were created. Lots of sound servers, so it was and still it yet another sound server without extra functionality. Meanwhile dmix existed since at least 2001 and JACK allowed route output of one application to input of another.

      At least pottering is working for Microsoft, ruining windows now…

      You know what? I wich him luck.

    • Tau
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      What is the systemd replacement you mention?

        • i_simp_4_tedcruz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          To ask a different question… what was wrong with initd? I’m the better part of a decade stale at this point but I don’t know that I ever ran into an edge case that initd couldn’t handle with a little massaging

          • gayhitler420@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            When systemd first showed up there wasn’t much parallelized init systems. People managing complex systems with many services may find the tools of systemd make their lives easier. Of course, nowadays all that complex multi service machine stuff is containerized and none of those containers run systemd 🤔

            If I were gonna psychologize it, poettering and kay typify what the Linux user of the 0s felt when they actually looked at what windows of the time had going on under the hood. “Look at you, tla username, pathetic creature of twenty text files under a trench coat!”

            The problem with that sentiment is that there’s an honesty to recognizing and accepting that you’re not too far removed from the z80 and it keeps you from believing all this computer stuff is more than it’s cracked up to be.

            No one who’s happy with python also keeps a loaded gun next to the server for when it acts up and that’s the problem.

    • gornius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Simple fails when complex problem arrives. Declarative approach of systemd daemons allows for more versatile solutions in unified format.