cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/44153801

Denmark’s energy minister called on citizens to reduce their energy use amid the ongoing Middle East conflict.

Oil prices jumped to over $100 a barrel on Thursday, raising fears of rising inflation.

“If it is not strictly necessary to drive the car, then don’t do it,” the minister stressed to Danish citizens.

  • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    meantime here in Tasmanian, endless fucking RVs and caravans being towed around aimlessly belching diesel exhaust for me to suck on as they go past me on my bicycle. I hope diesel gets to $10 a litre here

        • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yes, but oh my goodness have you pondered the depths of that abyss. You can’t spell fossil fuels without subsidy. It’s just fo___l f_el_.

      • 5715@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        No, it hurts the status-seeking middle class, last I checked, lower class doesn’t really have a lot of cars.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          The price of food is very dependent on the price of fuel. Poor people spend much much more of their income on food and other necessities that are driven by fuel costs and which cannot be done without.

          • 5715@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I agree, but then this isn’t about fuel, but about subsidising logistics.

            • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I don’t know what “this” you are talking about but the fact of the matter is that high fuel costs hurt the poorest most, and I don’t believe you have a meaningful solution to that.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Dunno about Denmark, but in my experience the higher class get to live wherever they want closer to their jobs, and probably own multiple cars they optionally drive short distances to show off.

          Whereas the working everday folks gotta drive their 2008 Honda-of-Theseus MANY more miles in commute from outside the city, daily, hoping that expensive rattly motor mount can hold until pay week before it fails.

          So taxing the heck out of fuel would hurt the working class a ton more.

  • blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Confused. Is Denmark footing the bill for their citizens’ oil? Seems like you would just say “hey, oil is expensive now - if you drive for no reason you’re a dumbass, but I won’t stop you.”

    • grue@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      3 days ago

      Maybe Denmark cares about preventing actual shortages, or about the damage wasteful driving with high gas prices does to the economy as a whole.

    • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Are you by chance American and a free market fundamentalist or a rugged individualist?

      A country asking its citizens publicly to pull together in adressing national risks is a very normal healthy thing to do. It offers obvious direct benefits. That you are confused by this, I find disturbing.

      Edit: consider the possibility that your cultural programming may be incorrect in at least some important ways.

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 days ago

      Oil costs are going to affect transportation costs all over the board, food, clothes, construction materials… so trying to reduce consumers consumption of oil can help to reduce that impact on the rest of economy. I don’t think is going to actually work, but politicians needs to start planting the seed of scapegoats for the future.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ah. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. Then when prices increase or rationing starts, they can point back and say “guys, we told you to use less gas!”

    • starchylemming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      the supply is going to be limited if this goes on

      agriculture and logistics need fuel more than joe drivearound

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      We’re like 2 days in and they’re already going into their reserves which aren’t large enough for supply to be constrained for very long.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Are these, like, strategic reserves for the purposes of national security? I honestly know nothing about how this sort of thing should function, but I feel like if a nation is drawing down their reserves, they should implement a rationing system. Or else set a high price for the use of their reserves so that consumers will search for other options

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Prices are also going up but its more to prevent economic stalling, which I suppose can be considered national security. High oil prices causes across board inflation. I’m sure the armed forces have a separate reserve.

          Rationing is a more extreme measure.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      If prices are high only the poor are affected. If you are rich and waste gas you aren’t affected. But if you are rich and save gas, it keeps prices lower for those that can’t afford it.

      • mjr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Most of the poor are on buses, trains or bikes, all of which are pretty good in Denmark. They can’t afford to fund cars and their random repair expenses.