• theUnlikely
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can you give an example with some numbers? I’m still not seeing it.

    • Maeve@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Say you produce a $thousand fmv worth of x. Your capitalist employer sells x for $2000. They sold x for less than what they pay you, $500 worth of x.

      • theUnlikely
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m trying really hard to understand since you seem so sure. But $2000 is more than both $1000 and $500. I’m unable to see how it could be considered less.

        • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not OP but I think what they are saying is: Your labor is effectively worth the end-price of the product, e.g. the $2000 but you are selling your labor for less than that e.g. $500.

          It’s a very weird phrasing, most people do not look at labor as something being sold (even if it is a good way of thinking about it imo). It could just be that they are trying to wiggle out of a misunderstanding.

          • fkn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            People don’t think of labor as being sold? What are wages then? It’s literally the price of your labor?

            I’ve never even considered that people don’t think of labor as something being sold.