• harpuajim@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does Lemmy (this community specifically) circlejerk as hard as reddit does when it comes to Epic bad?

    • Pxtl@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very yes. I like Lemmy but there’s a lot of “corporation bad giv updoot” here.

      • Phanatik@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s so few instances of corporations doing actually good things so opinions tend to skew negative. Epic hasn’t been thought of fondly since they started doing those exclusivity deals to try and bring people to their platform rather than making their platform a worthy competitor to Steam.

      • Rose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s very rare that those who hate Epic also hate Valve though, so it’s not about standing against a corporation. People just defend what they are used to and Epic disrupts that.

        • dandi8@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’ll be the first to say that I only begrudgingly accept Steam exists. However, I avoid using it and vastly prefer GOG due to the DRM-free nature of their store and the offline installers.

          Just because the hate on Epic is vocal does not mean that everyone likes the Steam status quo.

          • cottonmon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nor does it mean that the hate towards Epic doesn’t have any basis. They did a lot of shit that caused them to have a bad reputation.

          • Rose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            GOG has 0.5 to 2% of the market share, so I see no contradiction in my point on the scenario being rare.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re presuming the contributors to Lemmy are just the same in their choices of gaming as the broader market.

              It doesn’t take that much reading of posts in Lemmy to conclude that it’s heavilly biased towards adults, techies and lefties.

              In Statistics you can only make presumptions about a subset of subjects from statistical distribution data from the whole universe of subjects if the subset has been randomly selected, which this one most definitelly hasn’t - if only because of the “Reddit migration” Lemmy is filled with people with a certain kind of mindset (the ones for whom the actions of the Reddit CEO were displeasing enough to make them want to move and who actually had the will to do so) which isn’t at all the average person’s behaviour (the “average” just stayed there) plus even the Reddit population was already not representative of gamers generally (older in general).

              The general market share of GOG might give you a hint that here too it’s likely going to have fewer customers than something like Steam, but judging by comments I’ve read here it’s probably more than 2%, at least amongst commenters (no idea about lurkers).

    • guacupado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why do people always say this as if these forums are some niche group and not a huge spread of the general population?

      If you’re seeing multiple communities with a general opinion, maybe it’s “people hate them” instead of “why do all these different groups hate the same thing?”

      • Brawler Yukon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        if Sweeney ever loses a controlling amount of shares to them

        To be clear, he can’t “lose” shares to them. He might willingly sell shares to them (although that’s unlikely as he’s shown no indication of giving anyone else control over the company thus far), but it’s a private company - the shares aren’t just out there for Tencent to buy up and force a takeover.

      • ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think more likely is he’ll end up giving them 40% of the profits for nothing in return… and so have to lay people off despite turning a profit…

    • JasSmith@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s getting pretty tiring on Reddit. You’d think Sweeney were Hitler. I get that Epic’s exclusives were annoying, but they also give us free games every week. The hate is far past justification.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, fuck ‘em for hating on Linux too. If they put as much effort into supporting it as they do to opposing it there’d be a lot more love for Epic.

        • Rose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Opposing it? EOS supports Linux, EAC works on the Deck, and Epic regularly invest in things like Lutris. Sure, there are no native Linux ports on the Epic store, but that’s not been the general direction of the industry either. Proton/Wine can still be used to run the games sold by Epic.

      • Khotetsu@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I by no means have a raging hate-boner for Epic or anything, but they’ve definitely done enough to irritate me to the point where I haven’t even bothered with the store for the free games.

        It started off poorly with the store launching in such a bad state that it would’ve failed the HTML class I took in high school (it didn’t even have a cart. How can you launch a shopping site without even having the ability for people to buy more than one item at a time? I learned how to program that in 2007!) and it went downhill from there with stuff like the exclusivity deals and that sale they did where they marked 30% off on games that hadn’t even released yet, without even telling the developers or asking permission. Then they’ve rushed to embrace pretty muchthing I’ve praised Valve for refusing to deal with, from NFT games to AI that may or may not be violating copyright laws with the stuff making up the learning databases.

        Plenty to criticise, but I’m getting tired of watching them try to shove their foot back into their mouth.