PugJesus@lemmy.world to grimdank@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoArmor? UNKNOWN TECHNOLOGY!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1285arrow-down16
arrow-up1279arrow-down1imageArmor? UNKNOWN TECHNOLOGY!lemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to grimdank@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·edit-21 year agoRealisticly this would probably be enough to make a two legged mech like that fall tho
minus-squarePugJesus@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up36·1 year agoThe force from each side cancels each other out, preserving perfect balance 🙏
minus-squareTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 year agoThe rule of 2 brings balance to the force (and this ATST)
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoNot if it scutters to the side quickly. Like spot the Boston dynamics robot in testing videos when it gets shoved sideways.
minus-squareZorque@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoAT-STs are not known for their lateral movement ability.
Realisticly this would probably be enough to make a two legged mech like that fall tho
The force from each side cancels each other out, preserving perfect balance 🙏
The rule of 2 brings balance to the force (and this ATST)
Not if it scutters to the side quickly. Like spot the Boston dynamics robot in testing videos when it gets shoved sideways.
AT-STs are not known for their lateral movement ability.