OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Auditor says several college majors indoctrinate students and should be defundedabcnews.go.comexternal-linkmessage-square91fedilinkarrow-up1163arrow-down120
arrow-up1143arrow-down1external-linkAuditor says several college majors indoctrinate students and should be defundedabcnews.go.comOldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square91fedilink
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up81arrow-down12·1 年前Not the economics department, though. That’s definitely real science and is not an indoctrination program.
minus-squarevzq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up32·1 年前That can’t be true. If targeting you was a rational decision someone else would have targeted you a long time ago.
minus-squareHappycamperNZ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 年前Maybe I just went below the indifference curve and was worth the cost to target.
minus-squarebradorsomething@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前Probably targeting got cheaper. I think this is a left shift in the targeting curve.
minus-squareHappycamperNZ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前I did just wake up - wouldn’t this be a right shift in targeting curve? Lower cost of targeting me is a supply side change. At any specific cost to target there is an increased quantity willing to accept that cost?
Not the economics department, though. That’s definitely real science and is not an indoctrination program.
I feel targeted
That can’t be true. If targeting you was a rational decision someone else would have targeted you a long time ago.
Maybe I just went below the indifference curve and was worth the cost to target.
Probably targeting got cheaper. I think this is a left shift in the targeting curve.
I did just wake up - wouldn’t this be a right shift in targeting curve? Lower cost of targeting me is a supply side change.
At any specific cost to target there is an increased quantity willing to accept that cost?
Maybe you were just collateral damage