Remember when NFTs sold for millions of dollars? 95% of the digital collectibles are now probably worthless.::NFTs had a huge bull run two years ago, with billions of dollars per month in trading volume, but now most have crashed to zero, a study found.

  • Syndic@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because it’s pretty much the same.

    At the very core ownership that isn’t recognised by the state is meaningless. So that ape picture? No one really cares about some guy claiming to own it because they have control over the token. As long as it’s on the internet everyone can just copy it and there’s no authority caring about it one bit since NFT isn’t recognised as for example copyright is.

    Even when it comes to stuff like items in games, these also are only worth anything as long as the publisher of the game recognises your claim to it! And even if they did recognise it, there’s absolutely nothing preventing them from changing their minds later. Simply because they create the game however they like and have 100% control over it’s development.

    • deadlyduplicate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except it’s not ownership, it is digital rights management. Right now DRM is handled by private corporations, not the state, and it generally is anti-consumer. NFTs could be used for DRM in a more pro consumer way.

        • deadlyduplicate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Absolutely, companies are not going to just decide to implement NFTs in a way that gives more control to users unless it means more money for them. Does change the fact that the technology has that potential, even if it remain unutilized.

      • Syndic@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        NFTs could be used for DRM in a more pro consumer way.

        Only if the companies in charge would allow that. And they really have zero incentive to do so. The way it currently is, is way more profitable for them.