• AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    George Lucas: “America is the empire and the rebels are the Vietcong. Anakin is George Bush. The leader of the evil corporation is named after Newt Gingrich. The evil corporation invades a small democracy for plasma (space oil)”

    Chuds: “I sleep”

    TLJ: “woman”

    Chuds: foaming “YOU MADE IT POLITICAL YOU DAMN LIBERALS!”

      • wjrii@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Also George Lucas, Nationalizing private enterprise is bad, m’kay?

        The man tries to be on the side of the angels, god bless 'im, but while it’s clear politics were one more source to draw from in world building, he was not making any particularly coherent political argument, even in the PT; it all just more or less jibes with the worldview of a left-leaning Californian boomer.

        • neptune@dmv.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lucas is a less a political philosopher, and more into remixing. The imagery and the themed work.

    • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      some people are mad just because rey is a woman, some people are mad because rey is a badly written character. sexism vs common sense.

  • rsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    War, by its very nature is political. Probably war could be defined as “violent political disagreement”.

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of war movies don’t really show the personal or political motivations for both sides. Some sure do. But a lot of them are almost more of man VS god or man VS nature in their plots.

      In A New Hope, we watch a young man get radicalized. Han grapples with reasons to fight the whole trilogy. Etc

  • Bri Guy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only a Sith deals in absolutes

  • Lauchs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, in the same way Indiana Jones or Lord of the Rings is political, sure!

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Indy: [openly hates and fights literal members of a political party]

      Lord of the Rings I would peg as more philosophical than political.

      • Lauchs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        On Indy, absolutely and I think that’s the crux of the thing, it’s a matter of what criteria you use to define as making something political. I don’t think Indiana Jones was trying to say anything politically so much as “hey, these are some good bad guys!” Same with Star Wars. Now, if that’s enough for you to count something as political, that’s certainly an opinion to which you are entitled. For me, for something to be political it has to be more involved than just “that dictator/party/X is bad!” (E.g., I’d say Lucas tried to make an overtly political series with the prequels.)

        But to each their own!