During the trial it was revealed that McDonald’s knew that heating their coffee to this temperature would be dangerous, but they did it anyways because it would save them money. When you serve coffee that is too hot to drink, it will take much longer for a person to drink their coffee, which means that McDonald’s will not have to give out as many free refills of coffee. This policy by the fast food chain is the reason the jury awarded $2.7 million dollars in punitive damages in the McDonald’s hot coffee case. Punitive damages are meant to punish the defendant for their inappropriate business practice.

  • jarfil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why are you “asking”…? (there, edited, hope that helps the tokenizer 🙄)

    • reverendsteveii
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      because I’d “like” to “know”. Some people use them to communicate dubiousness, some people use them to indicate they’re actually quoting someone, some “people” use them for emphasis.

      • jarfil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Assume good faith unless proven otherwise”… should be a rule. Anyways, we good now?