fossilesque@mander.xyz to Data is Beautiful@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 months agoSometimes the beauty is in the data.mander.xyzimagemessage-square114linkfedilinkarrow-up1366arrow-down17
arrow-up1359arrow-down1imageSometimes the beauty is in the data.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyz to Data is Beautiful@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square114linkfedilink
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·3 months agoThere are abo 25% of countries in there and it doesn’t look like doctored data and agrees with lived experience. Your claims are baseless.
minus-squareWigners_friend@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoAre you concerned that nothing in your reply addresses whether the countries were chosen to support a trend?
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoNo pattern is obvious. There are no backwater countries, but otherwise most important ones are in there. You cannot plausibly cherry pick this effect while choosing so very many countries. A large part of global gdp is in there.
minus-squareWigners_friend@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoI can only laugh at this. “Most important countries”, yes no pattern.
There are abo 25% of countries in there and it doesn’t look like doctored data and agrees with lived experience. Your claims are baseless.
Are you concerned that nothing in your reply addresses whether the countries were chosen to support a trend?
No pattern is obvious. There are no backwater countries, but otherwise most important ones are in there. You cannot plausibly cherry pick this effect while choosing so very many countries. A large part of global gdp is in there.
I can only laugh at this. “Most important countries”, yes no pattern.